人民之友工委会根据本身以往对全国大选和州议会选举的论述,结合团结政府成立后的政治形势,决定对新古毛州议席补选,于2024年5月8日发表声明,供新古毛选民5月11日投票以至全国各族人民今后行动的参考。

赵明福民主促进会与明福家属不满首相安华多次拒见(他们),而决定在即将来临的元宵节(即阳历2月24日)上午11时正,到行动党的半山芭总部,向陆兆福拜年和探问关于明福命案调查的进展。人民之友工委会2024年2月5日(星期一)发表《5点声明》,表达我们对赵明福冤死不能昭雪事件的严正立场和明确态度。

Hindraf.png

人民之友工委会针对第15届全国大选投票提出 5项建议 和 两个选择

人民之友恭祝各界2024新年进步、万事如意!在新的一年里,坚持抗拒种族霸权统治! 阻止巫统恶霸卷土重来!

[人民之友20周年(2001-2021)纪念,发表对国内政治局势的看法] 坚持抗拒种族霸权统治! 阻止巫统恶霸卷土重来!

Stop%2BRestoration%2Bof%2BMahathirism.png

人民之友工委会即将在2020年9月9日发表文章,对“喜来登”政变发生后的我国政治局势,提出具体意见,供全国致力于真正民主改革的各民族、各阶层人士参考,并愿意与同道们交流、共勉!

Stop%2BRestoration%2Bof%2BMahathirism.png

Sahabat Rakyat akan mengemukakan pendapat khusus mengenai situasi politik di negara kita selepas "Rampasan kuasa Sheraton" pada 9 September 2020 untuk tatapan rakan semua bangsa dan semua strata yang komited terhadap reformasi demokratik tulen negara kita. Kami bersedia bertukar pendapat dan saling belajar dengan semua rakan-rakan sehaluan.

Stop%2BRestoration%2Bof%2BMahathirism.png

Bersatu padu, mempertahankan reformasi demokrasi tulen, buangkan khayalan, menghalang pemulihan Mahathirism.

 photo mahathir_PRU14_1.png

人民之友18周年(2001—2019)纪念,举办一场邀请4名专人演讲的政治论坛和自由餐会,希望通过此论坛激发更多的民主党团领导、学者、各阶层人士,共同为我国民主改革运动做出更大的努力和贡献。

 photo the-new-phase-of-democratic-reform-reject-state-islamization.jpg

马来西亚民主改革的新阶段马来西亚民主改革的新阶段 / The New Phase of Democratic Reform in Malaysia / Fasa Baru Reformasi Demokratik di Malaysia

509.png

人民之友根据2017年9月24日发表的《人民之友 对我国第14届大选意见书 》的内容与精神以及半年来国内和国外的政治形势,对5月9日投票提出具体意见,供全国选民参考。

Sunday, 26 February 2023

遮掩不住的美国贫富分化冷酷现实(人民日报钟声)

遮掩不住的美国贫富分化
冷酷现实(人民日报钟声)


点击箭头聆听内容:
❝美国是贫富分化最为严重的西方国家,在富者愈富、穷者愈穷的困局中越陷越深。无法解决贫富分化问题的美式民主,无疑是虚伪的。❞

本文是《人民日报》2023年2月24日刊出的一篇作者署名“钟声“的评论文章。全文如下(取自网络图库的以上插图和文内小标题为《人民之友》编者所加)——

美国是贫富分化最为严重的西方国家,在富者愈富、穷者愈穷的困局中越陷越深。美国人口普查局最新数据显示,2021年美国基尼系数达0.494,再创新高。贫富分化已成为美国社会痼疾,是美国民主人权的严重污点。

美国已经成为一个满是穷人的富国

20世纪70年代以来,美国收入不平等和财富悬殊程度日益加深。美联储的数据显示,2021年美国最富有的1%的人口财富总和达45.9万亿美元,这一数字超过了底层90%美国人的财富总和。彭博社指出,财富越来越往“金字塔”顶端集中,这是美国贫富差距继续扩大的最新信号。与此同时,美国仍有3700万人生活在贫困线以下。据美国皮尤研究中心最新发布的调查结果,1/4的美国家长表示,在过去的一年中,他们有时无法负担家人所需的食物或无法支付房租、抵押贷款。诺贝尔经济学奖得主斯蒂格利茨犀利指出,美国已经成为一个满是穷人的富国,一个巨大的鸿沟正横亘在上层阶级与其他阶级之间。

新冠疫情发生以来,美国贫富分化问题进一步恶化。由于货币超发和大规模财政支出助推股价和房价猛涨,美国最富裕阶层迅速扩大了自己的财富。美联储关于家庭财富的报告显示,截至2021年第四季度,美国最富有的1%的人口财富总和在疫情期间增加超过12万亿美元,增长1/3以上。与此同时,疫情引发的经济衰退导致大量美国人失业,低收入者经济状况进一步恶化。美国《大西洋月刊》报道说,美国低收入人群感染新冠病毒后,通常会延迟去看医生,因为他们根本没有钱。更讽刺的是,疫情期间,越是需要救助的特困人群,越是难以触及美国各项福利措施。联合国人权专家指出,美国应对新冠疫情的政策辜负了穷人。

美国是由那1%的富豪统治的国家

贫富分化加剧美国社会不公。在美国,高等教育资源总是不成比例地向富人倾斜,低收入人群失去平等受教育的机会。一项统计显示,在38所美国精英大学中,来自收入水平前1%美国家庭的学生数量多于来自收入水平处于后60%美国家庭的学生数量。美国住房和城市发展部报告显示,2020年全美有超过58万人无家可归,其中22.6万人露宿街头、住在汽车或废弃建筑物中。《美国医学会杂志》的一篇研究报告指出,受新冠疫情影响,美国加州最贫穷阶层和最富裕阶层的平均预期寿命差距扩大到15.51岁。种族矛盾加深、城市骚乱频发、暴力犯罪严重……美国社会乱象丛生,都与贫富差距扩大密切相关。

贫富分化痼疾难除,与美国的政治制度和美国政府代表的资本利益密切相关。“在美国政界,有两样东西很重要,第一是金钱,第二我就不记得了。”100多年前,美国联邦参议员汉纳这样形容美国政治。在金钱政治的影响下,美国政府的权力更倾向于为拥有资本的少数富人服务,而不是为大多数选民的利益服务。美国智库尼斯卡宁中心的研究显示,美国国会议员对富人的反应速度要远快于对穷人的反应速度。穷人代表的缺失已扩散至美国政治的各个层面。新加坡学者马凯硕指出:“美国是一个富豪统治国家,而不是一个民主国家。民主代表的是民有、民治、民享的政府,富豪统治则意味着,政府是被那1%的富豪有、富豪治、富豪享。”

“美式民主”无法解决贫富分化问题

作为头号资本主义国家,美国光鲜的面纱遮掩不住贫富分化的冷酷现实。无法解决贫富分化问题的美式民主,无疑是虚伪的。美国应倾听底层民众的呼声,正视国内贫富差距加剧的严峻现实并解决问题。▉



Friday, 24 February 2023

视觉天下 • 寰宇漫谈 美国的这个病,怕是治不好了

视觉天下 • 寰宇漫谈
美国的这个病,怕是治不好了



本图文是《中国日报》中文网2023年2月23日刊出的专稿,由以下人员共同制作——

画时代工作室出品

监制 | 徐小丹 罗杰
统筹 | 王晓莹
栏目负责人 | 宋晨
漫画| 罗杰 蔡艨 李旻 宋晨
文案 | 陈卫卫
视频| 王晓莹
编辑 | 王晓莹


全部图文如下——

有人说,“美利坚”的空气都是香甜的,可惜,这“香甜”的空气里,却总飘着一股硝烟味。为啥?

美国去年超过4万人死于枪击,每天超过1起大枪击案,小规模“砰砰乓乓”不计其数。

那美国能像咱们控制烟花爆竹一样,把枪支给禁了吗?基本没可能。不信,下面就来诊断一下,为啥说它是绝症。
 

病情一:“吃药”只管三天用

多少年了,每逢案发必反思,每次反思都无果,吃药只管三天用,三天以后准复发。
 

病情二:“脑子有病”

美国的建国史就是一部掠夺史,多少印第安人成了枪下鬼?美国人认为持枪是天赋人权,病根在脑子里,怎么治?
 

病情三:慢性损耗

这病虽然目前不致命,却作茧自缚,造成大量内耗。每年上千名警察牺牲,投入巨资改善安保。请问这些钱给老百姓增加医保,不香吗?
 

病情四:人人都是“大夫”

在所谓的“民主”社会,是个人就能提意见。大家开了无数“药方”,结果2023年1月又发生40余起枪击案,打破近年同期纪录。
 

病情五:既伤心又伤身

每个枪击案背后,都是无数家庭,甚至整个社区的悲剧,造成种族、阶层、身份的割裂。
 

病情六:防不胜防

连自由女神都要穿防弹衣了,这样的社会还有什么自由?
 

病情七:病来如山倒

枪击犯往往具有反社会人格和变态心理,“要玩就玩大的”,一出手就扫倒一片。
 

病情八:不限场合发作

案犯与执法人员如同玩“猫捉老鼠”游戏,你躲我闪,每个角落都可能射出子弹。
 

病情九:“人设”坍塌

当所谓的“美丽国”里,时不时能看到携枪的死神各处游荡,你还觉得它是个理想家园吗?▉

Thursday, 23 February 2023

思鸣《南洋网》时事点评: 行动党当家 不当权 !

思鸣《南洋网》时事点评:
行动党当家 不当权 !

 
点击箭头聆听内容:
本文是署名“思鸣”的时评人2023年2月23日发表于《南洋商报》/《南洋网》的时事点评。原标题:行动党当家不当权。对行动党在华教课题有所针砭,同时也有所期望。全文如下(文内小标题为《人民之友》编者所加)——

马华无法争取华教利益,尤其争取独中教育拨款与承认统考文凭,被谴责是当家不当权。如今民主行动党面对教育部长法丽娜西迪拒绝给予独中制度化拨款,也不会把承认统考文凭当作优先处理的事项,行动党正面对华社对它所承诺的宣言的谴责。

我国华教变成"争取式"的政治课题

教育部副部长林慧英则表示,将向团结政府“争取”承认统考文凭与独中制度化拨款,无法当家又当权。

在马来人占多数的马来西亚,华文教育变成一种争取式的政治课题,无法成为国家教育制度下的教育产品。由于当时的政治局势,造成华文教育的分歧,变成两个制度的教育发展。

国民型华文中学与华文独中获得辉煌发展,形成了百花齐放,百鸟齐鸣的良好趋势,但华教人士却纠结在独中教育不被政府所承认,而让这个课题变成了政治课题。

行动党如今当了家却无法实践承诺

行动党认为只要当上执政党,必然能够实现华社的梦想,于是斩钉截铁地为华社争取公平的对待。华社不满意马华处理华教课题的方式,于是寄望行动党来改变华教的命运,把行动党当成了华社的英雄。

但这个实现华社梦想面对政治现实,依然阻力重重,变成了一个披荆斩棘的局面,让行动党也显得毫无头绪。行动党谴责马华当家不当权,如今当了家,也是无法实践承诺,也一样面对教育部的拒绝。

行动党主席林冠英认为希望联盟执政时期曾经给予独中拨款,希盟所执政的州属如槟城与雪兰莪也拨款给独中,即使吉兰丹州已故聂阿兹也曾经拨款给独中,足见拨款给独中已经不是政治课题。

独中为国培育英才,理应给予拨款

独中为了国家教育人才,虽然体制上没有被纳入国家教育政策,但却对国家经济扮演培育英才重要的角色,因此,政府照顾独中是合乎情理。

既然团结政府获得华社的支持,也就应该礼尚往来,通过教育部给予独中部分拨款,以便对华人的支持表示感恩。

团结政府是顾忌马来人对政府支援独中产生的激烈反应,或者会被反对党利用来攻击团结政府违背马来人管制教育的方针,深恐对团结政府产生不良的政治反应。

华社非常期盼行动党/林慧英的承诺

承认统考与独中拨款是两回事,看来独中象征式拨款,可以解决华社的需求,也可以减低团结政府被围攻的可能性。若是独中获得象征式拨款,也就不是政府承认统考文凭,却也是对华教发展比较有利的发展。教育部副部长林慧英夸下海口,认为可以完成华社的教育使命,许多人对她是非常期盼的。

行动党利用马华当家不当权的口号来打击马华,现在正面对当家不当权的指责,也正是该党敢敢表现当家又当权的时刻,让该党所设定的政治方针付诸于行,以感谢华社对行动党的坚决支持。

若是行动党无法实践承诺,将来失去了捍卫华教的本钱,还不知行动党还有什么伎俩来赢取华人选票?

利亮时《星洲网》专栏评论:先把拨款资助独中制度化

利亮时《星洲网》专栏评论:
先把拨款资助独中制度化



点击箭头聆听内容:
❝进入2023年的今天,安华为首的政府有必要渐进式的处理华文独中的问题。在法理上,政府都没有义务拨款给华文独中,而当下的拨款都是在安抚华人社会。非制度性的拨款只是权宜之计,政府有必要对华文独中和其文凭,进行专业的评估。

华文独中虽然没有被纳入国家教育体系之中,但是超过半个世纪,其为我们的国家培育许多的人才。如今的政府不应再把此问题政治化,也不要再有政治的思维。政府在看华文独中的议题时,必须从教育的专业角度来看待这个问题,但是不能把华文独中与谋取盈利的私立学校等同视之。❞

作者在文中明确提出“安华政府有必要先制度化拨款给独中”的中肯见解——这也是我国华社以及各族维护母语教育人士的共同愿望和迫切要求。

本文是专长于新马华文教育与东南亚华人社会等课题的文化学者利亮时2023年2月23日发表于《星洲日报》/《星洲网》的专栏评论。原标题:勿再将教育议题政治化。全文如下(上图和文内小标题为《人民之友》编者所加)——

日前教育部长法丽娜在国会答问时指出,教育部基于华文独中在教育法令下不属于国家教育体系,因而无义务提供拨款。这番言论站在法的立场上是没有任何问题的,但是从华人情感来看,尤其是安华主政下的阁员有如此回答,就会导致部分人士的失望与不满。民主行动党对此议题相当具有敏感度,教育部副部长林慧英随后就表示会与教育部长一齐向财政部争取拨款。

我国华文教育经历了一个漫长严冬

华文独中议题不是什么新的议题,1960年代,马来亚华文教育迎来的是一个漫长的严冬。1960年出炉的《拉曼达立报告书》对独立前的《拉萨报告书》所实行的教育政策进行检讨。《拉曼达立报告书》虽然仍将华文小学列入国家教育体系之内,但却将华文中学逐出教育体系之外,除非这些华文中学接受教育部的建议改制为以英文为媒介的国民型中学。华文中学的接受改制,令华文教育陷入消亡的边缘。当时的教总和董总等民间团体为了突破这种困境,而分别提出争取和推行华文为官方语文和创建独立大学的运动。这一系列的运动虽然得到华人社会的广泛支援,但在政府强硬的立场下,皆以失败告终。从1960年代的风雨飘摇到1970年代的复兴运动,华文独立中学历经许多的风暴与冲击。

华文独中的问题,一路走来都不是一个纯教育的议题,其一直与政治、族群等议题纠缠在一起。统考文凭承认与否的问题,不断在每届大选举行时被提起,然而每次都是“无疾而终”。从当年质疑其学术水平,到后来海外许多国家纷纷承认之后,政治人物就用族群议题来阻挡对统考的承认。从胡申翁、马哈迪、阿都拉、纳吉,再回到马哈迪,历经将近半个世纪,此问题还是“无解”。历任政府从来没有认真看待这个教育的议题,而是一直将之视为政治的筹码。

安华政府有必要先制度化拨款给独中

进入2023年的今天,安华为首的政府有必要渐进式的处理华文独中的问题。在法理上,政府都没有义务拨款给华文独中,而当下的拨款都是在安抚华人社会。非制度性的拨款只是权宜之计,政府有必要对华文独中和其文凭,进行专业的评估。华文独中虽然没有被纳入国家教育体系之中,但是超过半个世纪,其为我们的国家培育许多的人才。如今的政府不应再把此问题政治化,也不要再有政治的思维。政府在看华文独中的议题时,必须从教育的专业角度来看待这个问题,但是不能把华文独中与谋取盈利的私立学校等同视之。

从我国教育发展的历程中,华文独中虽是私立中学,但是其采取低廉的收费来让许多中下阶层学子有受教育的机会。华文独中不是以集团的方式,并为股东谋取利润来经营学校。反之,其是以福利社团的形式在办教育,往往内部的董事都要掏腰包来支持学校的运作经费。现今的政府有必要认真看待华文独中在国家教育所扮演的角色,首先是把拨款资助独中制度化,让许多独中能够得到政府微量的拨款,之后则是摆脱政治的干扰,用教育的专业来评估独中的学术水平,从而提供全国60间独中整合的建议,并在未来进一步承认其文凭。▉


Wednesday, 22 February 2023

黄金祥《东方网》专栏评论: 当车伕怎么了?

  黄金祥《东方网》专栏评论:
    当车伕怎么了?


点击箭头聆听内容:
❝如果我国政坛尽是国盟这类YB当道,大马国力一再往后退,族群关系分崩离析,也毫不稀奇。❞

本文是时评人黄金祥2023年2月22日发表于《东方网》的专栏评论。原标题:当车伕怎么了?全文如下(文内小标题为《人民之友》编者所加)——

阿兹曼试图挑拨种族阶级的行为

伊党登嘉楼州行政议员阿兹曼依布拉欣医生,最近很红。

周前,他针对有妇女因穿短裤到警局报案被拒,发表了“高价货物应被包装得可爱和整齐”言论,把女性等同于“货物”,结果被网民炮轰。

隔没几天,他在脸书发布一张1900年的照片又再惹议。照片中,一位赤裸上身的华裔人力车伕,正负责载送一位身著马来服装的顾客。阿兹曼为照片写下注解:“在我的国土,曾经有过这么一刻……”(原文:Suatu ketika dulu di tanahairku……)

以阿兹曼过去的言论表现,大家很自然就会解读为“你看!曾经在大马的土地上,华人不过是马来人的下人。”

众多网民因此口诛笔伐,批评他有贬低他族之嫌。亦有网民标记大马通讯及多媒体委员会(MCMC)与警方,促请当局采取行动对付他。

有人搜出照片的出处,原来是槟城博物馆的展示品,解说20世纪初期,中国移民到南洋谋生时的情景;而人力车伕恰好是许多南洋华侨从事的工作之一。

马来网民对阿兹曼的行为并不买账

阿兹曼的帖子引来近2千条留言,我点进去看了一下,发现不少马来网民的言论,都不认同贬低华裔的论述。其中有人说:“今天的华人所到之处,都有‘唐人街’,他们有很强的凝聚力。反观我们,只会妒忌他人。"”这段留言,获得370个点赞。

也有一位马来网民说:“正是我们本身拖累自己的民族。如果贪婪与嫉妒之心一直不消除,民族必然衰败,又如何能够进步?”另一位则说:“成功的民族,必然是勤奋的民族。”

类似留言众多,无法一一细读。但,整体而言,基本可以看出,一般马来网民对阿兹曼试图挑拨种族阶级的行为并不买账。个人认为,华裔子弟亦无须闻笛起舞,以免反应过度,落了对方的套路。

阿兹曼强烈的种族思维与性别歧视

我查了一下维基网站,原来这位现年48岁的阿兹曼医生,毕业自伊拉克巴格达大学的牙科系。令人好奇的是,什么促使他当年远赴战祸连年的中东求学?本地大学的牙科不香吗?他在中东经历了什么,以致今日的种族思维与性别歧视如此强烈?

近年来,伊党和土团党沆瀣一气,走的尽是挑拨族群对立、马来人与伊斯兰教至上的政治路线,不是干涉非穆社群的生活选择自由,对女性衣著指指点点,就是一再发表伤害国民团结的言论。

这些满脑子种族宗教的政客,似乎都有个共同点,就是智商偏低。日前有伊党的加埔国会议员哈丽玛医生,为了诋毁“慈悯菜单”政策,居然发表“低品质食物会导致自闭症”的无知言论。

可见,顶著一个“医生”与“YB”的衔头,不一定意味著他们如何高人一等。反而是从言行举止中,可以看出一个政客的品德有多低劣或高尚。上述两位医生属于哪一类,自不言而喻。

阿兹曼的观念‚羞辱了各民族司机

话说回来,当人力车伕难道就很低下?或者说,坐上人力车伕的车子,难道就一定高高在上?昔日的车伕,等同于今日的司机,阿兹曼所影射的阶级观念,无疑羞辱了无数辛勤劳动、为大众服务的德士司机,其中不乏是他的族裔同胞。

阿兹曼显然读的书不够,不理解“职业不分高低贵贱”的简单道理。又,如果他有幸读过几年中文,便会懂得“吃得苦中苦,方为人上人”、“天行健,君子以自强不息”等名句,那么,他就不会愚蠢到,以职业来衡量一个人或一个民族的贵贱,更不会以百年前的历史,来暗示族群间的主仆关系。

事实上,如果阿兹曼之流有能力带领马来民族发奋图强,让更多马来人自力更生,甚至成为真材实料的大老板;那么,就算华人为他打工开车,又有何问题?

华裔祖辈大都从低做起,白手起家

中华民族在满清末年到民初,因恶政而四处逃难,在异乡落地后,绝大多数从事的都是苦力工作。这既是历史事实,自无需掩盖。试问,大马华裔的祖辈,谁不是这样挨过来的?即便是许多白手起家的著名华裔富豪,如林梧桐、李深静、郑鸿标、陈志远、吴炳炜等,无一不是从低处做起,胼手砥足,最终方得以成就其商业王国。

我个人对“人力车伕”特别有亲切感,因为家父在上个世纪自福建南来,就是在芙蓉从事三轮车伕一职。他靠体力与汗水,和当工厂女工的母亲,一手带大七个孩子。我家当年属于赤贫户,住非法木屋,缺水电,也从未获得任何政党协助。然而,凭著自身的努力,七个孩子中五个大学毕业,另外两个当上千万富豪。如今孙辈一代,大多学有专长,律师、医生等专业人士,陆续有来。

从赤贫走向富裕,类似我们这样的大马华裔家庭,比比皆是。家父当年虽然处于社会底层,但兢兢业业、老实勤恳,比起许多高居国会殿堂,却只会挑弄是非、贪赃枉法的YB们,不知高贵许多。

政坛尽是阿兹曼之流当道,哀哉!

那些贵为人民代议士的国盟议员,政治思维和敦马的种族论述一脉相承,自己吃香喝辣,对如何提振国家经济,如何协助B40人士摆脱贫困,完全束手无策,只会一味鼓吹让人民提取公积金,寅吃卯粮。

他们的治国智商零蛋,但破坏国家和睦的能力却爆棚。日前,伊党青年团在登州举办活动,游行队伍模仿古战士打扮,手持利剑、长矛和盾牌在街上游行,被视为对穆斯林的圣战号召,更是对非穆群体的严重挑衅。这类极端行为,与大马追求国民团结融洽的宗旨,完全背道而驰。如此肆无忌惮,内阁或警方如不即时采取行动对付,恐难以平息众怒。

可见,如果我国政坛尽是国盟这类YB当道,大马国力一再往后退,族群关系分崩离析,也毫不稀奇。

郑钦亮《星洲网》专栏评论: 老马走投无路‚ 去了土权党

郑钦亮《星洲网》专栏评论:
老马走投无路‚ 去了土权党


点击箭头聆听内容:
❝我想现在晚节不保的老马是真正的走到政治上的穷途末路了,自离开希盟造成数年的政治动荡后,他跳换的党越来越小,参与选举的失败越来越大,头顶上的政治光环,更是越来越暗淡了。

......在他目前仅有的小小江湖,也不过是一个固执老人的妙想天开和自我激励而已,土权党应是他的末路。❞

本文是时评人邓钦亮2023年2月21日发表于《星洲日报》/《星洲网》的专栏评论。原标题:老马走投无路,去了土权党。全文如下(上图和文内小标题为《人民之友》编者所加)——

老马又退出他一手创立的政党祖国斗士党,原因是他的政治接班人儿子慕克力在不顾他的反对之下,坚持率党退出祖国行动联盟,于是老马老羞成怒,愤而退出,并将退党信交给斗士党总秘书阿米鲁丁。

老马辞职动作‚成了人们嘲笑谈资

老人家这种动不动便辞职的动作,如今对国内政坛的确是没有多大的冲击力,充其量只会是各政党茶余饭后的趣味谈资,而且会是带着嘲弄的口气笑着说的。

在政坛,被扶植的儿子不理老子,最后老子不要儿子,而且是涉及老马这样的“超级老爸”,例子还真的不多,再不笑谈也未必有下一个机会了。

记得老马德高望重时,曾被喻为马来西亚政治演变的“活字典”,毕竟他是大马历史上任期最久的首相,也是历史上唯一的两任首相纪录保持者。

然而老政客晚节不保,如今不只是大马选民看腻了老人家,现在就连他的儿子和最忠实的支持者也不想翻看这本“活字典”了。

你说老马知道他的政治处境吗?会慌张或者是意兴阑珊,带着落寞的心情淡出政坛?

第15届大选已告知老马残酷处境

但是你再看他精明如一个中年人,接近百岁之龄依然口齿清晰,行动便利且仍拥有壮志豪情,肯定清楚知道大部分支持者已经离他而去,去年11月的第15届大选,已经清楚告诉他残酷的答案。

当时在斗士党旗帜下以祖国行动联盟之名出战的125名候选人,所有候选人在大选中被团灭,也都失去了他们的按柜金,包括盟主老马和他的儿子慕克力。

他们分别在浮罗交怡和尤仑国席守土失败,这个战绩也被喻为大马政史上最庞大的失败队伍,更已被列入老马一生多个“之最”中之一。

祖国行动联盟的特点是百分百亲马来人的联盟,由老马的斗士党、全国印裔穆斯林联合党、土著权威党和泛马来西亚伊斯兰阵线组成,但是马来人给出的答案是,他们的票给了土团和伊斯兰党后所剩无几,连巫统和公正党也没分到多少,哪会投给什么祖国行动联盟这样的杂牌军呢?

老政客不甘愿大势已去还要玩下去

可是这位国际知名的老政客,就是不愿意承认自己的声势和气场早已经大江东去矣……,所以他还要玩下去。

他去哪里玩?他去了土著权威党阿里那边玩,拿了个顾问职,要在土权那里东山再起。然而土权党从来就没有权威过,以前他跟着老马走,也跟着老马在上届大选全军覆没,现在与老马一样被老马儿子嫌弃,这样的失败组合,怕是谁都会看死他们没啥作为。

我想现在晚节不保的老马是真正的走到政治上的穷途末路了,自离开希盟造成数年的政治动荡后,他跳换的党越来越小,参与选举的失败越来越大,头顶上的政治光环,更是越来越暗淡了。

老马只是"自我激励"走向他的末路

老骥伏枥,志在千里;烈士暮年,壮心不已,讲的就是老马仍放不下的坚持与毅力,但事实上,在他目前仅有的小小江湖,也不过是一个固执老人的妙想天开和自我激励而已,土权党应是他的末路。▉


Tuesday, 21 February 2023

US Hegemony and Its Perils

US Hegemony 
and Its Perils



Click on the arrow to listen to the contents:
The US Hegemony and Its Perils was published on the official website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China on 20 Feb 2023 4:28pm. Below is the full text of this report (the above picture comes from Chinese media, added by Editorial of Sahabat Rakyat)--

Contents 
Introduction
      I. Political Hegemony—Throwing Its Weight Around
II. Military Hegemony—Wanton Use of Force  
III. Economic Hegemony—Looting and Exploitation 
IV. Technological Hegemony—Monopoly and Suppression
V. Cultural Hegemony—Spreading False Narratives
Conclusion

Introduction

Since becoming the world's most powerful country after the two world wars and the Cold War, the United States has acted more boldly to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, pursue, maintain and abuse hegemony, advance subversion and infiltration, and willfully wage wars, bringing harm to the international community.

The United States has developed a hegemonic playbook to stage "color revolutions," instigate regional disputes, and even directly launch wars under the guise of promoting democracy, freedom and human rights. Clinging to the Cold War mentality, the United States has ramped up bloc politics and stoked conflict and confrontation. It has overstretched the concept of national security, abused export controls and forced unilateral sanctions upon others. It has taken a selective approach to international law and rules, utilizing or discarding them as it sees fit, and has sought to impose rules that serve its own interests in the name of upholding a "rules-based international order."

This report, by presenting the relevant facts, seeks to expose the U.S. abuse of hegemony in the political, military, economic, financial, technological and cultural fields, and to draw greater international attention to the perils of the U.S. practices to world peace and stability and the well-being of all peoples.

I. Political Hegemony — Throwing Its Weight Around

The United States has long been attempting to mold other countries and the world order with its own values and political system in the name of promoting democracy and human rights.

◆ Instances of U.S. interference in other countries' internal affairs abound. In the name of "promoting democracy," the United States practiced a "Neo-Monroe Doctrine" in Latin America, instigated "color revolutions" in Eurasia, and orchestrated the "Arab Spring" in West Asia and North Africa, bringing chaos and disaster to many countries.

In 1823, the United States announced the Monroe Doctrine. While touting an "America for the Americans," what it truly wanted was an "America for the United States."

Since then, the policies of successive U.S. governments toward Latin America and the Caribbean Region have been riddled with political interference, military intervention and regime subversion. From its 61-year hostility toward and blockade of Cuba to its overthrow of the Allende government of Chile, U.S. policy on this region has been built on one maxim-those who submit will prosper; those who resist shall perish.

The year 2003 marked the beginning of a succession of "color revolutions" -- the "Rose Revolution" in Georgia, the "Orange Revolution" in Ukraine and the "Tulip Revolution" in Kyrgyzstan. The U.S. Department of State openly admitted playing a "central role" in these "regime changes." The United States also interfered in the internal affairs of the Philippines, ousting President Ferdinand Marcos Sr. in 1986 and President Joseph Estrada in 2001 through the so-called "People Power Revolutions."

In January 2023, former U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo released his new book Never Give an Inch: Fighting for the America I Love. He revealed in it that the United States had plotted to intervene in Venezuela. The plan was to force the Maduro government to reach an agreement with the opposition, deprive Venezuela of its ability to sell oil and gold for foreign exchange, exert high pressure on its economy, and influence the 2018 presidential election.

◆ The U.S. exercises double standards on international rules. Placing its self-interest first, the United States has walked away from international treaties and organizations, and put its domestic law above international law. In April 2017, the Trump administration announced that it would cut off all U.S. funding to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) with the excuse that the organization "supports, or participates in the management of a programme of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization." The United States quit UNESCO twice in 1984 and 2017. In 2017, it announced leaving the Paris Agreement on climate change. In 2018, it announced its exit from the UN Human Rights Council, citing the organization's "bias" against Israel and failure to protect human rights effectively. In 2019, the United States announced its withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty to seek unfettered development of advanced weapons. In 2020, it announced pulling out of the Treaty on Open Skies.

The United States has also been a stumbling block to biological arms control by opposing negotiations on a verification protocol for the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) and impeding international verification of countries' activities relating to biological weapons. As the only country in possession of a chemical weapons stockpile, the United States has repeatedly delayed the destruction of chemical weapons and remained reluctant in fulfilling its obligations. It has become the biggest obstacle to realizing "a world free of chemical weapons."

◆ The United States is piecing together small blocs through its alliance system. It has been forcing an "Indo-Pacific Strategy" onto the Asia-Pacific region, assembling exclusive clubs like the Five Eyes, the Quad and AUKUS, and forcing regional countries to take sides. Such practices are essentially meant to create division in the region, stoke confrontation and undermine peace.

◆ The U.S. arbitrarily passes judgment on democracy in other countries, and fabricates a false narrative of "democracy versus authoritarianism" to incite estrangement, division, rivalry and confrontation. In December 2021, the United States hosted the first "Summit for Democracy," which drew criticism and opposition from many countries for making a mockery of the spirit of democracy and dividing the world. In March 2023, the United States will host another "Summit for Democracy," which remains unwelcome and will again find no support.

II. Military Hegemony — Wanton Use of Force

The history of the United States is characterized by violence and expansion. Since it gained independence in 1776, the United States has constantly sought expansion by force: it slaughtered Indians, invaded Canada, waged a war against Mexico, instigated the American-Spanish War, and annexed Hawaii. After World War II, the wars either provoked or launched by the United States included the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the Kosovo War, the War in Afghanistan, the Iraq War, the Libyan War and the Syrian War, abusing its military hegemony to pave the way for expansionist objectives. In recent years, the U.S. average annual military budget has exceeded 700 billion U.S. dollars, accounting for 40 percent of the world's total, more than the 15 countries behind it combined. The United States has about 800 overseas military bases, with 173,000 troops deployed in 159 countries.

According to the book America Invades: How We've Invaded or been Militarily Involved with almost Every Country on Earth, the United States has fought or been militarily involved with almost all the 190-odd countries recognized by the United Nations with only three exceptions. The three countries were "spared" because the United States did not find them on the map.

◆ As former U.S. President Jimmy Carter put it, the United States is undoubtedly the most warlike nation in the history of the world. According to a Tufts University report, "Introducing the Military Intervention Project: A new Dataset on U.S. Military Interventions, 1776-2019," the United States undertook nearly 400 military interventions globally between those years, 34 percent of which were in Latin America and the Caribbean, 23 percent in East Asia and the Pacific, 14 percent in the Middle East and North Africa, and 13 percent in Europe. Currently, its military intervention in the Middle East and North Africa and sub-Saharan Africa is on the rise.

Alex Lo, a South China Morning Post columnist, pointed out that the United States has rarely distinguished between diplomacy and war since its founding. It overthrew democratically elected governments in many developing countries in the 20th century and immediately replaced them with pro-American puppet regimes. Today, in Ukraine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Pakistan and Yemen, the United States is repeating its old tactics of waging proxy, low-intensity, and drone wars.

◆ U.S. military hegemony has caused humanitarian tragedies. Since 2001, the wars and military operations launched by the United States in the name of fighting terrorism have claimed over 900,000 lives with some 335,000 of them civilians, injured millions and displaced tens of millions. The 2003 Iraq War resulted in some 200,000 to 250,000 civilian deaths, including over 16,000 directly killed by the U.S. military, and left more than a million homeless.

The United States has created 37 million refugees around the world. Since 2012, the number of Syrian refugees alone has increased tenfold. Between 2016 and 2019, 33,584 civilian deaths were documented in the Syrian fightings, including 3,833 killed by U.S.-led coalition bombings, half of them women and children. The Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) reported on 9 November 2018 that the air strikes launched by U.S. forces on Raqqa alone killed 1,600 Syrian civilians.

The two-decades-long war in Afghanistan devastated the country. A total of 47,000 Afghan civilians and 66,000 to 69,000 Afghan soldiers and police officers unrelated to the September 11 attacks were killed in U.S. military operations, and more than 10 million people were displaced. The war in Afghanistan destroyed the foundation of economic development there and plunged the Afghan people into destitution. After the "Kabul debacle" in 2021, the United States announced that it would freeze some 9.5 billion dollars in assets belonging to the Afghan central bank, a move considered as "pure looting."

In September 2022, Turkish Interior Minister Suleyman Soylu commented at a rally that the United States has waged a proxy war in Syria, turned Afghanistan into an opium field and heroin factory, thrown Pakistan into turmoil, and left Libya in incessant civil unrest. The United States does whatever it takes to rob and enslave the people of any country with underground resources.

The United States has also adopted appalling methods in war. During the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the Kosovo War, the War in Afghanistan and the Iraq War, the United States used massive quantities of chemical and biological weapons as well as cluster bombs, fuel-air bombs, graphite bombs and depleted uranium bombs, causing enormous damage on civilian facilities, countless civilian casualties and lasting environmental pollution.

III. Economic Hegemony — Looting and Exploitation

After World War II, the United States led efforts to set up the Bretton Woods System, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, which, together with the Marshall Plan, formed the international monetary system centered around the U.S. dollar. In addition, the United States has also established institutional hegemony in the international economic and financial sector by manipulating the weighted voting systems, rules and arrangements of international organizations including "approval by 85 percent majority," and its domestic trade laws and regulations. By taking advantage of the dollar's status as the major international reserve currency, the United States is basically collecting "seigniorage" from around the world; and using its control over international organizations, it coerces other countries into serving America's political and economic strategy.

◆ The United States exploits the world's wealth with the help of "seigniorage." It costs only about 17 cents to produce a 100 dollar bill, but other countries had to pony up 100 dollar of actual goods in order to obtain one. It was pointed out more than half a century ago, that the United States enjoyed exorbitant privilege and deficit without tears created by its dollar, and used the worthless paper note to plunder the resources and factories of other nations.

◆ The hegemony of U.S. dollar is the main source of instability and uncertainty in the world economy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States abused its global financial hegemony and injected trillions of dollars into the global market, leaving other countries, especially emerging economies, to pay the price. In 2022, the Fed ended its ultra-easy monetary policy and turned to aggressive interest rate hike, causing turmoil in the international financial market and substantial depreciation of other currencies such as the Euro, many of which dropped to a 20-year low. As a result, a large number of developing countries were challenged by high inflation, currency depreciation and capital outflows. This was exactly what Nixon's secretary of the treasury John Connally once remarked, with self-satisfaction yet sharp precision, that "the dollar is our currency, but it is your problem."

◆ With its control over international economic and financial organizations, the United States imposes additional conditions to their assistance to other countries. In order to reduce obstacles to U.S. capital inflow and speculation, the recipient countries are required to advance financial liberalization and open up financial markets so that their economic policies would fall in line with America's strategy. According to the Review of International Political Economy, along with the 1,550 debt relief programs extended by the IMF to its 131 member countries from 1985 to 2014, as many as 55,465 additional political conditions had been attached.

◆ The United States willfully suppresses its opponents with economic coercion. In the 1980s, to eliminate the economic threat posed by Japan, and to control and use the latter in service of America's strategic goal of confronting the Soviet Union and dominating the world, the United States leveraged its hegemonic financial power against Japan, and concluded the Plaza Accord. As a result, Yen was pushed up, and Japan was pressed to open up its financial market and reform its financial system. The Plaza Accord dealt a heavy blow to the growth momentum of the Japanese economy, leaving Japan to what was later called "three lost decades."

◆ America's economic and financial hegemony has become a geopolitical weapon. Doubling down on unilateral sanctions and "long-arm jurisdiction," the United States has enacted such domestic laws as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, and the Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, and introduced a series of executive orders to sanction specific countries, organizations or individuals. Statistics show that U.S. sanctions against foreign entities increased by 933 percent from 2000 to 2021. The Trump administration alone has imposed more than 3,900 sanctions, which means three sanctions per day. So far, the United States had or has imposed economic sanctions on nearly 40 countries across the world, including Cuba, China, Russia, the DPRK, Iran and Venezuela, affecting nearly half of the world's population. "The United States of America" has turned itself into "the United States of Sanctions." And "long-arm jurisdiction" has been reduced to nothing but a tool for the United States to use its means of state power to suppress economic competitors and interfere in normal international business. This is a serious departure from the principles of liberal market economy that the United States has long boasted.

IV. Technological Hegemony — Monopoly and Suppression

The United States seeks to deter other countries' scientific, technological and economic development by wielding monopoly power, suppression measures and technology restrictions in high-tech fields.

◆ The United States monopolizes intellectual property in the name of protection. Taking advantage of the weak position of other countries, especially developing ones, on intellectual property rights and the institutional vacancy in relevant fields, the United States reaps excessive profits through monopoly. In 1994, the United States pushed forward the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), forcing the Americanized process and standards in intellectual property protection in an attempt to solidify its monopoly on technology.

In the 1980s, to contain the development of Japan's semiconductor industry, the United States launched the "301" investigation, built bargaining power in bilateral negotiations through multilateral agreements, threatened to label Japan as conducting unfair trade, and imposed retaliatory tariffs, forcing Japan to sign the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. As a result, Japanese semiconductor enterprises were almost completely driven out of global competition, and their market share dropped from 50 percent to 10 percent. Meanwhile, with the support of the U.S. government, a large number of U.S. semiconductor enterprises took the opportunity and grabbed larger market share.

◆ The United States politicizes, weaponizes technological issues and uses them as ideological tools. Overstretching the concept of national security, the United States mobilized state power to suppress and sanction Chinese company Huawei, restricted the entry of Huawei products into the U.S. market, cut off its supply of chips and operating systems, and coerced other countries to ban Huawei from undertaking local 5G network construction. It even talked Canada into unwarrantedly detaining Huawei's CFO Meng Wanzhou for nearly three years.

The United States has fabricated a slew of excuses to clamp down on China's high-tech enterprises with global competitiveness, and has put more than 1,000 Chinese enterprises on sanction lists. In addition, the United States has also imposed controls on biotechnology, artificial intelligence and other high-end technologies, reinforced export restrictions, tightened investment screening, suppressed Chinese social media apps such as TikTok and WeChat, and lobbied the Netherlands and Japan to restrict exports of chips and related equipment or technology to China.

The United States has also practiced double standards in its policy on China-related technological professionals. To sideline and suppress Chinese researchers, since June 2018, visa validity has been shortened for Chinese students majoring in certain high-tech-related disciplines, repeated cases have occurred where Chinese scholars and students going to the United States for exchange programs and study were unjustifiably denied and harassed, and large-scale investigation on Chinese scholars working in the United States was carried out.

◆ The United States solidifies its technological monopoly in the name of protecting democracy. By building small blocs on technology such as the "chips alliance" and "clean network," the United States has put "democracy" and "human rights" labels on high-technology, and turned technological issues into political and ideological issues, so as to fabricate excuses for its technological blockade against other countries. In May 2019, the United States enlisted 32 countries to the Prague 5G Security Conference in the Czech Republic and issued the Prague Proposal in an attempt to exclude China's 5G products. In April 2020, then U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced the "5G clean path," a plan designed to build technological alliance in the 5G field with partners bonded by their shared ideology on democracy and the need to protect "cyber security." The measures, in essence, are the U.S. attempts to maintain its technological hegemony through technological alliances.

◆ The United States abuses its technological hegemony by carrying out cyber attacks and eavesdropping. The United States has long been notorious as an "empire of hackers," blamed for its rampant acts of cyber theft around the world. It has all kinds of means to enforce pervasive cyber attacks and surveillance, including using analog base station signals to access mobile phones for data theft, manipulating mobile apps, infiltrating cloud servers, and stealing through undersea cables. The list goes on.

U.S. surveillance is indiscriminate. All can be targets of its surveillance, be they rivals or allies, even leaders of allied countries such as former German Chancellor Angela Merkel and several French Presidents. Cyber surveillance and attacks launched by the United States such as "Prism," "Dirtbox," "Irritant Horn" and "Telescreen Operation" are all proof that the United States is closely monitoring its allies and partners. Such eavesdropping on allies and partners has already caused worldwide outrage. Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, a website that has exposed U.S. surveillance programs, said that "do not expect a global surveillance superpower to act with honor or respect. There is only one rule: there are no rules."

V. Cultural Hegemony — Spreading False Narratives

The global expansion of American culture is an important part of its external strategy. The United States has often used cultural tools to strengthen and maintain its hegemony in the world.

◆ The United States embeds American values in its products such as movies. American values and lifestyle are a tied product to its movies and TV shows, publications, media content, and programs by the government-funded non-profit cultural institutions. It thus shapes a cultural and public opinion space in which American culture reigns and maintains cultural hegemony. In his article The Americanization of the World, John Yemma, an American scholar, exposed the real weapons in U.S. cultural expansion: the Hollywood, the image design factories on Madison Avenue and the production lines of Mattel Company and Coca-Cola.

There are various vehicles the United States uses to keep its cultural hegemony. American movies are the most used; they now occupy more than 70 percent of the world's market share. The United States skilfully exploits its cultural diversity to appeal to various ethnicities. When Hollywood movies descend on the world, they scream the American values tied to them.

◆ American cultural hegemony not only shows itself in "direct intervention," but also in "media infiltration" and as "a trumpet for the world." U.S.-dominated Western media has a particularly important role in shaping global public opinion in favor of U.S. meddling in the internal affairs of other countries.

The U.S. government strictly censors all social media companies and demands their obedience. Twitter CEO Elon Musk admitted on 27 December 2022 that all social media platforms work with the U.S. government to censor content, reported Fox Business Network. Public opinion in the United States is subject to government intervention to restrict all unfavorable remarks. Google often makes pages disappear.

U.S. Department of Defense manipulates social media. In December 2022, The Intercept, an independent U.S. investigative website, revealed that in July 2017, U.S. Central Command official Nathaniel Kahler instructed Twitter's public policy team to augment the presence of 52 Arabic-language accounts on a list he sent, six of which were to be given priority. One of the six was dedicated to justifying U.S. drone attacks in Yemen, such as by claiming that the attacks were precise and killed only terrorists, not civilians. Following Kahler's directive, Twitter put those Arabic-language accounts on a "white list" to amplify certain messages.

◆The United States practices double standards on the freedom of the press. It brutally suppresses and silences media of other countries by various means. The United States and Europe bar mainstream Russian media such as Russia Today and the Sputnik from their countries. Platforms such as Twitter, Facebook and YouTube openly restrict official accounts of Russia. Netflix, Apple and Google have removed Russian channels and applications from their services and app stores. Unprecedented draconian censorship is imposed on Russia-related contents.

◆The United States abuses its cultural hegemony to instigate "peaceful evolution" in socialist countries. It sets up news media and cultural outfits targeting socialist countries. It pours staggering amounts of public funds into radio and TV networks to support their ideological infiltration, and these mouthpieces bombard socialist countries in dozens of languages with inflammatory propaganda day and night.

The United States uses misinformation as a spear to attack other countries, and has built an industrial chain around it: there are groups and individuals making up stories, and peddling them worldwide to mislead public opinion with the support of nearly limitless financial resources.

Conclusion

While a just cause wins its champion wide support, an unjust one condemns its pursuer to be an outcast. The hegemonic, domineering, and bullying practices of using strength to intimidate the weak, taking from others by force and subterfuge, and playing zero-sum games are exerting grave harm. The historical trends of peace, development, cooperation, and mutual benefit are unstoppable. The United States has been overriding truth with its power and trampling justice to serve self-interest. These unilateral, egoistic and regressive hegemonic practices have drawn growing, intense criticism and opposition from the international community.

Countries need to respect each other and treat each other as equals. Big countries should behave in a manner befitting their status and take the lead in pursuing a new model of state-to-state relations featuring dialogue and partnership, not confrontation or alliance. China opposes all forms of hegemonism and power politics, and rejects interference in other countries' internal affairs. The United States must conduct serious soul-searching. It must critically examine what it has done, let go of its arrogance and prejudice, and quit its hegemonic, domineering and bullying practices.


《美国的霸权霸道霸凌 及其危害》报告

《美国的霸权霸道霸凌
及其危害》报告


点击箭头聆听内容:
本文是中国外交部2023年2月20日16:13时分在其官网上发布的《美国的霸权霸道霸凌及其危害》报告。全文如下(上图取自中国媒体,为《人民之友》编者所加)——

目 录
               序 言
        一、肆意妄为的政治霸权
       二、穷兵黩武的军事霸权
        三、巧取豪夺的经济霸权
       四、垄断打压的科技霸权
       五、蛊惑人心的文化霸权
      结束语

序 言

美国在经历两次世界大战和冷战成为全球头号强国后,更加肆无忌惮,粗暴干涉别国内政,谋求霸权、维护霸权、滥用霸权,大搞颠覆渗透,动辄发动战争,贻害国际社会。

美国惯于打着民主、自由、人权的幌子,发动颜色革命,挑唆地区争端,甚至直接发动战争。美国固守冷战思维,大搞集团政治,挑动对立对抗。美国泛化国家安全,滥用出口管制,强推单边制裁。美国对国际法和国际规则合则用,不合则弃、则废,打着“基于规则的国际秩序”旗号,谋着维护自身“家法帮规”的私利。

本报告重在通过列举事实,揭露美国滥用政治军事、经济金融、科技文化霸权的种种恶行劣迹,让国际社会进一步看清美方做法对世界和平稳定和各国民生福祉带来的严重危害。

一、肆意妄为的政治霸权

美国长期打着所谓民主和人权旗号,企图按照美国的价值观和政治制度塑造其他国家和世界秩序。

◆美国干涉他国内政的例子比比皆是,借“ 推广民主”之名在拉美推行“新门罗主义”,在欧亚煽动“颜色革命”,在西亚北非策动“阿拉伯之春”,给多国带来混乱和灾难。

1823年,美国发表“门罗宣言”,讲的是“美洲是美洲人的美洲”,想的却是“美洲是美国人的美洲”,此后历届政府对拉美和加勒比地区的政策都是政治干涉、军事介入和政权颠覆。无论是敌视封锁古巴61年,还是颠覆智利阿连德政府,都是“顺我者昌,逆我者亡”。

2003年起,接连发生格鲁吉亚“玫瑰革命”、乌克兰“橙色革命”和吉尔吉斯斯坦“郁金香革命”。美国国务院公开承认在这些“政权更迭”中发挥了“中心作用”。美国还干预菲律宾内政,1986年和2001年以“人民力量”为名将前总统老马科斯和埃斯特拉达赶下台。

美国前国务卿蓬佩奥2023年1月出版新书《寸步不让》,披露美国曾计划对委内瑞拉实施干预,拟迫使马杜罗政府同反对派达成协议,剥夺委内瑞拉通过出口石油和黄金获取外汇的能力,施加经济高压,影响2018年总统选举。

◆美国对国际规则采取双重标准,以私利为先,毁约退群,将国内法凌驾于国际法之上。2017年4月,特朗普政府以联合国人口基金“支持和参与强迫堕胎或非自愿绝育手术”为由,宣布对该组织“断供”。美国曾于1984年、2017年两次退出联合国教科文组织。2017年,宣布退出气候变化《巴黎协定》。2018年,以对以色列“存在偏见”和“无法有效保护人权”为由,宣布退出联合国人权理事会。2019年,为不受束缚地发展先进武器,宣布退出《中导条约》。2020年,宣布退出《开放天空条约》。

美国还反对《禁止生物武器公约》核查议定书谈判,妨碍国际社会对各国生物武器活动进行核查,成为生物军控进程的“绊脚石”。作为世界上唯一拥有化学武器库存的国家,美国多次推迟化学武器销毁时间,消极履行义务,成为建立“无化武世界”的最大障碍。

◆美国借助盟友体系拉帮结派。在亚太地区强推“印太战略”,纠集“五眼联盟”“四边机制”“美英澳三边安全伙伴关系”,大搞封闭排他的小圈子,强迫地区国家选边站队,实质是制造地区分裂、煽动对抗、破坏和平。

◆美国肆意评判他国民主,公然炮制“民主对抗威权”虚假叙事,挑动隔阂分裂,煽动对立对抗。2021年12月,美国举办首届“领导人民主峰会”,践踏民主精神,制造世界分裂,遭到许多国家批评和反对。2023年3月,美国还将再次举办“领导人民主峰会”,将继续不受欢迎、不得人心。

二、穷兵黩武的军事霸权

美国的历史,充斥着暴力和扩张。1776年独立以来美国动用武力不断扩张,屠杀印第安人,入侵加拿大,发动美墨战争,策动美西战争,吞并夏威夷。第二次世界大战后,挑起或发动朝鲜战争、越南战争、海湾战争、科索沃战争、阿富汗战争、伊拉克战争、利比亚战争、叙利亚战争,用军事霸权为扩张开路。近年年均军事预算7000多亿美元,占世界军费总支出的40%,超过第2名到第16名国家的总和。美国目前在海外有约800个军事基地,在159个国家驻扎了17.3万人的军队。

《美国侵略:我们是如何入侵或军事干预地球上几乎每一个国家的》一书指出,在联合国承认的190多个国家中,只有3个国家没与美国打过仗或受其军事干预。这3个国家能够“幸免于难”,是因为美国没有在地图上发现它们。

◆正如美国前总统卡特所言,美国无疑是世界上最好战的国家。塔夫茨大学研究报告《军事干预项目:1776年至2019年美国军事干预的新数据集》显示,1776年至2019年,美国在全球进行了近400次军事干预,34%针对拉丁美洲和加勒比地区,23%针对东亚和太平洋地区,14%针对中东和北非地区,13%针对欧洲地区。当前,美国对中东和北非以及撒哈拉以南非洲地区的军事干预呈现上升趋势。

《南华早报》专栏作家亚历克斯•洛指出,美国从建国到现在很少区分外交和战争,上个世纪推翻了很多发展中国家的民选政府,马上替之以亲美的傀儡政权。今天,从乌克兰、伊拉克、阿富汗、利比亚、叙利亚到巴基斯坦、也门,美国一如既往本性难移,开展代理人、低强度和无人机战争。

◆美国军事霸权酿成人道惨剧。2001年以来,美国以反恐之名发动的战争和军事行动已造成超过90万人死亡,其中约有33.5万是平民,数百万人受伤,数千万人流离失所。2003年伊拉克战争导致约20万至25万平民死亡,被美军直接致死的超过16000人,造成100多万人无家可归。

美国在全球制造了3700万难民。2012年以来,仅叙利亚难民数量就增加10倍。2016年至2019年,叙利亚有记载死于战乱的平民达33584人,其中美国领导的联军轰炸致死3833人,半数是妇女和儿童。美国公共电视网2018年11月9日报道,仅美军对拉卡市发动的空袭就导致1600名平民死亡。

长达20年的阿富汗战争让阿富汗满目疮痍。共4.7万名阿富汗平民以及6.6万至6.9万名与“9•11”事件无关的阿富汗军人和警察在美军行动中丧生,1000多万人流离失所。阿富汗战争毁坏了当地经济发展基础,让阿富汗人民一贫如洗。2021年“喀布尔大溃败”后,美国宣布冻结阿富汗央行约95亿美元资产,被认为是“赤裸裸的掠夺”。

2022年9月,土耳其内政部长索伊卢在出席集会时表示,美在叙利亚开展代理人战争,把阿富汗变成鸦片种植田和海洛因加工厂,让巴基斯坦陷入动荡、利比亚内乱不断。无论哪个国家有地下资源,美国都会竭尽所能去掠夺和奴役那里的人们。

美军还曾采用骇人听闻手段参与战争,在朝鲜战争、越南战争、海湾战争、科索沃战争、阿富汗战争、伊拉克战争中,大量使用生化武器和集束炸弹、油气炸弹、石墨炸弹、贫铀炸弹,造成大量民用设施损毁、无数无辜平民伤亡、持久生态环境污染。

三、巧取豪夺的经济霸权

第二次世界大战后,美国主导建立布雷顿森林体系、国际货币基金组织和世界银行,与马歇尔计划共同确立起以美元为核心的国际货币体系。美国还利用加权投票制、重大事项85%以上多数通过等国际组织规则安排以及一系列国内贸易法规,建立起国际经济金融领域的制度性霸权。借助美元的主要国际储备货币地位向全世界收取“铸币税”,利用对国际组织的控制,胁迫他国服务美国政治经济战略。

◆美国利用“铸币税”攫取全世界财富。凭借一张成本仅约17美分的百元美钞,让其他国家实实在在地向美国提供价值相当于100美元的商品和服务。法国前总统戴高乐半个多世纪前就曾指出,“美国享受着美元所创造的超级特权和不流眼泪的赤字,她用一钱不值的废纸去掠夺其他民族的资源和工厂”。

◆美元霸权是世界经济不稳定性和不确定性的主要根源。新冠疫情背景下,美国滥用全球金融霸权,向全球市场注入数万亿美元,而买单的却是其他国家特别是新兴经济体。2022年,美联储结束超宽松货币政策,转向激进加息政策,导致国际金融市场动荡,欧元等多种货币大幅贬值,创下20年来新低,许多发展中国家因此遭遇严重通货膨胀、本币贬值和资本外流。尼克松政府财政部长康纳利曾得意洋洋但又一针见血地指出,“美元是我们的货币,却是你们的麻烦”。

◆美国操纵国际经济金融组织,在援助他国时施加附带条款。要求受援国推行金融自由化、加大金融市场开放,使受援国经济政策符合美国战略,为美国资本渗透和投机减少阻碍。《国际政治经济学评论》统计,1985年至2014年,国际货币基金组织向131个成员国实施了1550个债务援助项目,附带了55465项附加政治条款。

◆美国擅用经济胁迫手段打压对手。20世纪80年代,美国为消除日本经济威胁,控制并利用日本为美国对抗苏联和称霸世界战略目标服务,再次施展霸权主义金融外交,与日本签订“广场协议”,逼迫日元升值,开放金融市场,改革金融体制。“广场协议”沉重打击了日本经济的元气,日本此后进入“失去的三十年”。

◆美国经济金融霸权沦为地缘政治武器。美国大搞单边制裁和“长臂管辖”,制订了《国际紧急状态经济权力法》《全球马格尼茨基人权问责法》《以制裁反击美国敌人法》等国内法并推出一系列行政令,对特定国家、组织或个人实施制裁。据统计,从2000年到2021年美国对外制裁增加933%。仅特朗普政府就实施3900多项制裁,相当于平均每天挥舞3次“制裁大棒”。截至目前,美国已对古巴、中国、俄罗斯、朝鲜、伊朗、委内瑞拉等世界上近40个国家实施过经济制裁,全球近一半人口受到影响。“美利坚合众国”已然成为“制裁合众国”。“长臂管辖”完全沦为美国借国家公权力打压商业竞争对手和干涉正常国际商业交易的工具,彻底背离美国长期标榜的自由主义市场经济理念。

四、垄断打压的科技霸权

美国在高科技领域大搞垄断打压、技术封锁,遏阻其他国家科技和经济发展。

◆美国借知识产权保护之名搞知识产权垄断。利用各国特别是发展中国家在知识产权上的弱势地位和在相关领域制度上的空缺实施垄断,攫取高额垄断利润。1994年,美国推动《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》,强推知识产权保护的美国化进程和标准,企图固化科技垄断优势。

20世纪80年代,美国为打击日本半导体产业发展,采取包括启动“301”调查、通过多边协议为双边谈判制造筹码、威胁将日本列为不公平贸易国、加征报复性关税等手段,逼迫日本签订《美日半导体协定》,导致日本半导体企业几乎完全退出全球竞争,市场份额由50%跌至10%。同时,在美国政府扶持下,大量美国半导体企业趁机抢占市场。

◆美国将科技问题政治化、武器化、意识形态化。美国泛化国家安全概念,动用国家力量打压和制裁中国华为公司,限制华为产品进入美国市场,断供芯片和操作系统,在全世界胁迫其他国家禁止华为参与当地5G网络建设,还策动加拿大无理拘押华为首席财务官孟晚舟近3年。

美国还炮制各种借口,围追打压具有国际竞争力的中国高科技企业,已将1000多家中国企业列入各种制裁清单。美国还对生物技术、人工智能等高端技术实施管控,强化出口管制,严格投资审查,打压包括TikTok、微信等中国社交媒体应用程序,游说荷兰和日本限制对中国芯片和相关设备与技术出口。

美国还在对华科技人才政策方面采取双重标准。2018年6月以来,针对部分高科技专业的中国留学生缩短了签证有效期限,屡屡无端禁止和滋扰中国学者赴美学术交流以及学生赴美留学,对在美华人学者开展大规模调查,排挤、打压华人科研群体。

◆美国借民主之名维护科技霸权。打造“芯片联盟”“清洁网络”等科技“小圈子”,给高科技打上民主、人权的标签,将技术问题政治化、意识形态化,为对他国实施技术封锁寻找借口。2019年5月,美国拉拢32个国家在捷克召开“布拉格5G安全大会”,发布“布拉格提案”,企图排除中国5G技术产品。2020年4月,时任美国国务卿蓬佩奥宣布“5G清洁路径”,计划在5G领域构建以“民主”为意识形态纽带、以“网络安全”为目标的技术联盟。美国上述举措的实质,就是通过技术联盟维护科技霸权。

◆美国滥用科技霸权大搞网络攻击和监听窃密。美国是全球窃密大户,作为“黑客帝国”早已恶名远扬。美国网络攻击和监听监视无孔不入,窃密手段五花八门,包括利用模拟手机基站信号接入手机盗取数据,操控手机应用程序,侵入云服务器,通过海底光缆进行窃密等。

美国实施“无差别”监视监听。从竞争对手到盟友,甚至包括德国前总理默克尔、法国多任总统等盟国领导人,无不在监听范围之内。“棱镜门”“脏盒”“怒角计划”“电幕行动”等美国网络监控和攻击事件,印证了美国的盟友伙伴都在美国的严密监控之列。美国窃听盟友伙伴的行径早已引起国际社会公愤。曾曝光美国监听项目的“维基解密”网站创始人阿桑奇说,不要期待这个“监听超级大国”会做出有尊严和让人尊重的行为。规则只有一个,那就是没有规则。

五、蛊惑人心的文化霸权

美国文化的全球扩张是其对外战略的重要组成部分。美国惯用文化来加强和维护其在世界上的霸权地位。

◆美国在电影等商品中植入美国价值观。通过影视产品、图书、各种媒体以及资助非营利性文化机构,“嵌入配售”美国价值观和生活方式,打造出以美式文化为主导的文化和舆论空间,推行文化霸权。美国学者约翰•耶马在其《世界的美国化》一文中指出,关于文化扩张,美国真正的武器是好莱坞的电影业、麦迪逊大街的形象设计厂和马特尔公司、可口可乐公司的生产线。

美国推行文化霸权的形式多种多样,占据世界70%以上份额的美国电影是主渠道之一。美国电影善于利用多元文化背景,创造对各族裔吸引力。随着好莱坞电影在全世界不断发行,美国将价值观裹挟其中,大加渲染。

◆美国文化霸权从“直接介入”走向“媒介渗透”和“世界喇叭”,在干涉他国内政时,更加依靠美国主导的西方媒体,煽动全球舆论。

美国政府严格审查所有社交媒体公司,要求执行政府指示。福克斯商业频道报道,2022年12月27日,推特公司首席执行官马斯克表示,所有社交媒体平台都与美国政府合作,对内容进行审查。美国的舆论导向受到政府干预,限制所有不利言论。谷歌经常让链接页面消失。

美国国防部操控社交媒体。2022年12月,美国独立调查网站“The Intercept”披露,2017年7月美军中央司令部官员纳撒尼尔•卡勒给推特公共政策团队发了一个表格,包含52个阿拉伯语账号,要求优先服务其中6个,其中一个专门用来宣传美国无人机对也门的军事袭击,例如袭击是精确的,杀死的是恐怖分子而不是平民。按照卡勒要求,推特将这批阿拉伯语账号放入“白名单”,用来放大某些信息。

◆美国奉行双重新闻自由标准,粗暴打压他国媒体。通过种种手段让别国媒体“消音”。今日俄罗斯电视台、卫星通讯社等俄主流媒体纷纷被美欧禁止落地;俄罗斯官方账号被推特、脸书、优兔等平台公开限流;俄罗斯频道和应用程序被奈飞、苹果、谷歌应用商店等直接下架;涉俄内容遭到史无前例的严格审查。

◆美国滥用文化霸权对社会主义国家“和平演变”。建立起专门针对社会主义国家的新闻媒体和文化传媒机构。而美国扶植的负责意识形态渗透的电台、电视网由政府提供巨额经费,用数十种语言文字,昼夜不停地对社会主义国家煽动宣传。

美国将虚假信息作为攻击他国的工具,已形成“黑金、黑论、黑嘴”舆论产业链条。为一些团体和个人源源不断提供“黑金”,支持其炮制“黑论”,以此影响国际舆论。

结束语

得道多助,失道寡助。恃强凌弱、巧取豪夺、零和博弈等霸权霸道霸凌行径危害深重,和平、发展、合作、共赢的历史潮流不可阻挡。美国以强权挑战真理,以私利践踏正义。这些单边主义、唯我独尊、倒行逆施的霸权做法正在引发国际社会越来越强烈的批评和反对。

国与国之间要相互尊重、平等相待。大国应该有大国的样子,更要带头走出一条对话而不对抗、结伴而不结盟的国际交往新路。中国一贯反对一切形式的霸权主义和强权政治,反对干涉别国内政。美国应该反躬自省,深刻检视自己的所作所为,放弃傲慢与偏见,摒弃霸权霸道霸凌。

(全文完) 

通告 Notification




工委会议决:将徐袖珉除名

人民之友工委会2020年9月27日常月会议针对徐袖珉(英文名: See Siew Min)半年多以来胡闹的问题,议决如下:

鉴于徐袖珉长期以来顽固推行她的“颜色革命”理念和“舔美仇华”思想,蓄意扰乱人民之友一贯以来的“反对霸权主义,反对种族主义”政治立场,阴谋分化甚至瓦解人民之友推动真正民主改革的思想阵地,人民之友工委会经过长时间的考察和验证,在2020年9月27日会议议决;为了明确人民之友创立以来的政治立场以及贯彻人民之友现阶段以及今后的政治主张,必须将徐袖珉从工委会名单上除名,并在人民之友部落格发出通告,以绝后患。

2020年9月27日发布



[ 漫画新解 ]
新冠病毒疫情下的马来西亚
舔美精神患者的状态

年轻一辈人民之友有感而作


注:这“漫画新解”是反映一名自诩“智慧高人一等”而且“精于民主理论”的老姐又再突发奇想地运用她所学会的一丁点“颜色革命”理论和伎俩来征服人民之友队伍里的学弟学妹们的心理状态——她在10多年前曾在队伍里因时时表现自己是超群精英,事事都要别人服从她的意愿而人人“惊而远之”,她因此而被挤出队伍近10年之久。

她在三年前被一名年长工委推介,重新加入人民之友队伍。可是,就在今年年初她又再故态复萌,尤其是在3月以来,不断利用部落格的贴文,任意扭曲而胡说八道。起初,还以“不同意见者”的姿态出现,以博取一些不明就里的队友对她的同情和支持,后来,她发现了她的欺骗伎俩无法得逞之后,索性撤下了假面具,对人民之友一贯的“反对霸权主义、反对种族主义”的政治立场,发出歇斯底里的叫嚣,而暴露她设想人民之友“改旗易帜”的真面目!

尤其是在新冠病毒疫情(COVID-19)课题上,她公然猖狂跟人民之友的政治立场对着干,指责人民之友服务于中国文宣或大中华,是 “中国海外统治部”、“中华小红卫兵”等等等等。她甚至通过强硬粗暴手段擅自把我们的WhatsApp群组名称“Sahabat Rakyat Malaysia”改为“吐槽美国样衰俱乐部”这样的无耻行动也做得出来。她的这种种露骨的表现足以说明了她是一名赤裸裸的“反中仇华”份子。

其实,在我们年轻队友看来,这名嘲讽我们“浪费了20年青春”[人民之友成立至今近20年(2001-9-9迄今)]并想要“拯救我们年轻工委”的这位“徐大姐”,她的思想依然停留在20年前的上个世纪。她初始或许是不自觉接受了“西方民主”和“颜色革命”思想的培养,而如今却是自觉地为维护美国的全球霸权统治而与反对美国霸权支配全球的中国人民和全世界各国(包括马来西亚)人民为敌。她是那么狂妄自大,却是多么幼稚可笑啊!

她所说的“你们浪费了20年青春”正好送回给她和她的跟班,让他们把她的这句话吞到自己的肚子里去!


[ 漫画新解 ]
新冠病毒疫情下的马来西亚
"公知"及其跟班的精神面貌

注:这“漫画新解”是与<人民之友>4月24日转贴的美国政客叫嚣“围剿中国”煽动颠覆各国民间和组织 >(原标题为<当心!爱国队伍里混进了这些奸细……>)这篇文章有关联的。这篇文章作者沈逸所说的“已被欧美政治认同洗脑的‘精神欧美人’”正是马来西亚“公知”及其跟班的精神面貌的另一种写照!




[ 漫画新解 ]
新冠病毒疫情下的马来西亚
"舔美"狗狗的角色

编辑 / 来源:人民之友 / 网络图库

注:这“漫画新解”是与《察网》4月22日刊林爱玥专栏文章<公知与鲁迅之间 隔着整整一个中国 >这篇文章有关联的,这是由于这篇文章所述说的中国公知,很明显是跟这组漫画所描绘的马来西亚的“舔美”狗狗,有着孪生兄弟姐妹的亲密关系。

欲知其中详情,敬请点击、阅读上述文章内容,再理解、品味以下漫画的含义。这篇文章和漫画贴出后,引起激烈反响,有人竟然对号入座,暴跳如雷且发出恐吓,众多读者纷纷叫好且鼓励加油。编辑部特此接受一名网友建议:在显著的布告栏内贴出,方便网友搜索、浏览,以扩大宣传教育效果。谢谢关注!谢谢鼓励!












Malaysia Time (GMT+8)

面书分享 FB SHARE