Sunday, 6 September 2015

Our prospects of the democratic reform in Malaysia--The speech of Sahabat Rakyat presidium in the 14th anniversary commemoration event (updated photo on 7 Sep 2015)

Our prospects of the democratic reform in Malaysia
The speech of Sahabat Rakyat presidium in the 14th anniversary commemoration event


Sahabat Rakyat is holding a forum cum luncheon at DeFortune Restaurant, Kulai on 6-Sep 2015 (Sunday) in commemoration of its 14th anniversary and announcing its committee members 2015-2017. Below is the speech delivered by Choo Shinn Chei on behalf of the presidium (presidium members are Chan Jock Lan, Choo Shinn Chei and Nyam Kee Han) in the event. Text below is translated from original version in the Chinese language. In the case of any discrepancy between the English rendition and the original Chinese version, the Chinese version shall prevail. –

Thanks emcee. Good afternoon to our panel speakers, leaders of democratic parties and organizations and all our friends who are concerned about the future of democratic reform in Malaysia.

Sahabat Rakyat was formed on 9-September 2001, today we are celebrating its 14th anniversary. We are holding “The new phase of democratic reform in Malaysia” forum mainly due to below mentioned considerations.

In fewer than 8 years, Pakatan Rakyat (PR), which had been leading the democratic reform movement of the present phase since the 12th general election till date has undergone a process from inception to disintegration. This process symbolizes the struggle of multi-racial political coalition in the form of PR against UMNO hegemonic rule has ended up in failure. This process is of great revelation for the subsequent democratic reform movement in Malaysia.

PR is a political-parties coalition that was initially established to jointly form state governments in accordance to the will of the people in opposing BN rule. Its disintegration is due to the insistence of Hadi Awang-led conservative faction in PAS on implementing Hudud law that conforms to state Islamisation that has eroded the religious freedom of people of all ethnic groups especially the rights of non-Muslims.

This is an inevitable consequence from the political stance of Hadi Awang-led conservative faction in PAS that is ready to be enlisted under the banner of UMNO hegemony which goes against the will of the people in opposing UMNO hegemonic rule.

During the development stage of PR, many prominent leaders in PR component parties tried to avoid Hudud-law-related issues, to them the realistic problem of state Islamisation is the elephant in the room, except the late Karpal Singh, leader of DAP who took a clear-cut position. The reality has proven that shelving the major contradiction is a mistake.

We are of the view that “racial oppression” and “racial assimilation” imposed by UMNO ruling clique on the ethnic minorities is reflected through the implementation of “State Malayization” and “State Islamization” policies. UMNO ruling clique is using these policies to cover up the fact that while the ruling class oppresses and exploits non-Malay ethnic minorities, they are in fact oppressing and exploiting the Malay working class as well. This is to divert the focus of the struggle of the Malay ethnic community, and to hinder the struggle and split the unity of the oppressed Malay working class and other oppressed ethnic communities. Only then UMNO hegemonic clique can prolong its rule on the people of all ethnic groups.

After undergoing the domination and oppression of “state Malayization” and “state Islamization”, the minorities and non-Muslim communities are being more resentful about UMNO hegemonic rule, hoping PR will safeguard the interests of ethnic minorities and non-Muslim communities, unequivocally oppose the UMNO hegemony’s Malay sovereignty (Ketuanan Melayu) and state Islamisation system. When PR chose to shelve this major contradiction, the sincerity of PR in pushing for democratic reform will become questionable to the people who uphold the rights of ethnic minorities and non-Muslim communities. This is detrimental to the unity of the majority.

Besides, when PR shelved this major contradiction, those lurking in PR who agree with Malay sovereignty and state Islamization system in substance played the role of The Fifth Column when the time came. They split PR to prolong the UMNO hegemonic rule and therefore people from all ethnic groups continue to be oppressed and enslaved.

Thus, all opposition parties leaders should learn a lesson from the disintegration of Pakatan Rakyat to oppose both “State Malayization” and “State Islamization” steadfastly and awaken the oppressed Malay working class to unite with people from all ethnic groups to fight UMNO hegemonic rule resolutely, in order to avoid repeating the failure of PR. Malay political leaders split from PAS who are devoted to form a new political party, PKR leaders who initiated a broader coalition of political parties and non-government organizations (NGOs) and DAP leaders who are bringing about the formation of PR 2.0 should express their political stance on both “State Malayization” and “State Islamization” propositions explicitly.

The main characteristic of State Islamization is built on the will of exercising Islam by the government to impose Islam on people of all ethnic groups who originally believe in different religion with the ultimate aim of establishing an Islamic State. Malaysia is a multi-racial and multi-religious society. The forced State Islamization executed by UMNO hegemonic ruling clique, especially when Mahathir announced that “Malaysia is an Islamic state” arbitrarily is obviously incompatible with the interest and aspirations of people from all ethnic groups in our country. Hence, from the aspect of non-Muslims in our country, opposing State Islamization is to safeguard the basic human rights of freedom of religion. It is also a sensible, justified and legitimate act to uphold human rights. Therefore, opposing “State Islamization” is absolutely different from “opposing Islam” that actually violates human rights. It is clearly understood that the two are not equivalent. It is obviously a mala fide and malicious distortion of those with ulterior motives to say that “opposing State Islamization” is “opposing Islam”.

Currently there are certain leaders of the opposition parties advocate the idea that “opposition parties can work together with leaders from UMNO-BN or the component parties of BN in order to ‘save Malaysia’” so as to realize their dream of sharing the regime, especially the motion to attempt to form a coalition government with a fraction of the bigwigs from UMNO led by Mahathir Mohamed who was the chief culprit dominating the state Islamization since 1980s. This inconceivable case has aroused the attention and debates of democratic parties, organizations and individuals in our country. It is generally believed that this is a suggestion that does not learn a lesson from the failure of PR, it is a suggestion that betrays the interests and aspirations of the people.

We are in view that all political parties and non-government organizations (NGOs) that serve the people in the country, including Dong Zong which has been safeguarding the rights of mother-tongue education of the Chinese community, Hindraf which commits to strive for the rights and interests of the Hindu community, and parties and NGOs in Sabah Sarawak which fight for the rights and interests of major ethnic groups in their states, should discuss democratically demands of the people from all ethnic groups (including opposing “state Malayization” and opposing “state Islamization”) in the context of burying UMNO hegemonic rule, hence forming an overall demand for the new phase of democratic reform in order to unite the majority masses and push on the struggle to bury UMNO hegemonic ruling.

This is merely our humble opinion for your reference only. We welcome all to exchange ideas on this openly. Thank you.

Chan Jock Lan, Choo Shinn Chei and Nyam Kee Han, Presidium members of Sahabat Rakyat presented souvenirs to the panel speakers in the company of Ang Pei Shan, Secretariat member of Sahabat Rakyat and moderator of the forum. (In picture above from left to right) Ang Pei Shan, Nyam Kee Han, Waytha Moorthy, Firdaus Husni, Chan Jock Lan, Lina Soo, S.Arutchelvan, Dzulkefly Ahmad and Choo Shinn Chei.



Related links:

1. Sahabat Rakyat is in Preparation for the 14th Anniversary Commemoration Event   Theme: The New Phase of Democratic Reform in Malaysia.

2. Sahabat Rakyat is celebrating its 14th anniversary Inviting experts to explore the new phase of democratic reform.

3. Forum cum luncheon in commemoration of Sahabat Rakyat’s 14th Anniversary, 5 experts delivering speech and 2 guests are invited to speak

0 comments:

通告 Notification




工委会议决:将徐袖珉除名

人民之友工委会2020年9月27日常月会议针对徐袖珉(英文名: See Siew Min)半年多以来胡闹的问题,议决如下:

鉴于徐袖珉长期以来顽固推行她的“颜色革命”理念和“舔美仇华”思想,蓄意扰乱人民之友一贯以来的“反对霸权主义,反对种族主义”政治立场,阴谋分化甚至瓦解人民之友推动真正民主改革的思想阵地,人民之友工委会经过长时间的考察和验证,在2020年9月27日会议议决;为了明确人民之友创立以来的政治立场以及贯彻人民之友现阶段以及今后的政治主张,必须将徐袖珉从工委会名单上除名,并在人民之友部落格发出通告,以绝后患。

2020年9月27日发布



[ 漫画新解 ]
新冠病毒疫情下的马来西亚
舔美精神患者的状态

年轻一辈人民之友有感而作


注:这“漫画新解”是反映一名自诩“智慧高人一等”而且“精于民主理论”的老姐又再突发奇想地运用她所学会的一丁点“颜色革命”理论和伎俩来征服人民之友队伍里的学弟学妹们的心理状态——她在10多年前曾在队伍里因时时表现自己是超群精英,事事都要别人服从她的意愿而人人“惊而远之”,她因此而被挤出队伍近10年之久。

她在三年前被一名年长工委推介,重新加入人民之友队伍。可是,就在今年年初她又再故态复萌,尤其是在3月以来,不断利用部落格的贴文,任意扭曲而胡说八道。起初,还以“不同意见者”的姿态出现,以博取一些不明就里的队友对她的同情和支持,后来,她发现了她的欺骗伎俩无法得逞之后,索性撤下了假面具,对人民之友一贯的“反对霸权主义、反对种族主义”的政治立场,发出歇斯底里的叫嚣,而暴露她设想人民之友“改旗易帜”的真面目!

尤其是在新冠病毒疫情(COVID-19)课题上,她公然猖狂跟人民之友的政治立场对着干,指责人民之友服务于中国文宣或大中华,是 “中国海外统治部”、“中华小红卫兵”等等等等。她甚至通过强硬粗暴手段擅自把我们的WhatsApp群组名称“Sahabat Rakyat Malaysia”改为“吐槽美国样衰俱乐部”这样的无耻行动也做得出来。她的这种种露骨的表现足以说明了她是一名赤裸裸的“反中仇华”份子。

其实,在我们年轻队友看来,这名嘲讽我们“浪费了20年青春”[人民之友成立至今近20年(2001-9-9迄今)]并想要“拯救我们年轻工委”的这位“徐大姐”,她的思想依然停留在20年前的上个世纪。她初始或许是不自觉接受了“西方民主”和“颜色革命”思想的培养,而如今却是自觉地为维护美国的全球霸权统治而与反对美国霸权支配全球的中国人民和全世界各国(包括马来西亚)人民为敌。她是那么狂妄自大,却是多么幼稚可笑啊!

她所说的“你们浪费了20年青春”正好送回给她和她的跟班,让他们把她的这句话吞到自己的肚子里去!


[ 漫画新解 ]
新冠病毒疫情下的马来西亚
"公知"及其跟班的精神面貌

注:这“漫画新解”是与<人民之友>4月24日转贴的美国政客叫嚣“围剿中国”煽动颠覆各国民间和组织 >(原标题为<当心!爱国队伍里混进了这些奸细……>)这篇文章有关联的。这篇文章作者沈逸所说的“已被欧美政治认同洗脑的‘精神欧美人’”正是马来西亚“公知”及其跟班的精神面貌的另一种写照!




[ 漫画新解 ]
新冠病毒疫情下的马来西亚
"舔美"狗狗的角色

编辑 / 来源:人民之友 / 网络图库

注:这“漫画新解”是与《察网》4月22日刊林爱玥专栏文章<公知与鲁迅之间 隔着整整一个中国 >这篇文章有关联的,这是由于这篇文章所述说的中国公知,很明显是跟这组漫画所描绘的马来西亚的“舔美”狗狗,有着孪生兄弟姐妹的亲密关系。

欲知其中详情,敬请点击、阅读上述文章内容,再理解、品味以下漫画的含义。这篇文章和漫画贴出后,引起激烈反响,有人竟然对号入座,暴跳如雷且发出恐吓,众多读者纷纷叫好且鼓励加油。编辑部特此接受一名网友建议:在显著的布告栏内贴出,方便网友搜索、浏览,以扩大宣传教育效果。谢谢关注!谢谢鼓励!












Malaysia Time (GMT+8)

面书分享 FB SHARE