玛丽安莫达《星洲网》专栏评论:
王建民错了！
凯里不是当首相的料
| 点击箭头聆听内容： |
❝王建民能否研究一下凯里的从政历史，并列出他在使大马成为一个对所有人都更好的国家方面的贡献？作为国会议员，凯里是否公开反对贪污、种族主义和宗教极端主义；这些如果不加以制止，就会毁掉国家。❞
本文是时评人玛丽安莫达2023-05-05
08:03发表于《星洲日报》/《星洲网》的专栏评论。原标题：王建民错了！凯里不是当首相的料。全文如下——
王建民答凯里的话让主持人惊讶大笑
在凯里和沙里尔的播客节目，讨论范围从本地课题到三个脱离政治的从政者，凯里问王建民，他和沙里尔是否应该加入行动党。
王建民表示，他同意凯里和沙里尔都应该加入行动党，因为他们“都符合条件”，更何况，该党需要首相人选，这让主持人感到惊讶和大笑。
王建民是在开玩笑还是认真的？
在1500万名不低于18岁或不超过70岁的大马人中，至少会有一个具有魅力、符合资历、理想和符合资格的首相人选。
为什么王建民选择这两人？凯里和沙里尔是职业政客，他们被自己的政党拒绝。
大马人已经厌倦了那些缺乏新鲜想法的老面孔。我们想要新血，而不是“曾经红极一时的人”。
王建民的想法，是否在砸自己的脚？
王建民是在尽可能地婉转些，还是在作出策略性行动？州选在即，王建民是否想建立行动党向凯里和沙里尔示好的形象，并希望被认为是本着政治的体育精神向马来领袖伸出橄榄枝？
王建民是否想表明，欢迎凯里和沙里尔加入行动党意味着该党愿意妥协，这是否也表明凯里愿意摆脱其前政党的种族根基？
没有人应该那么天真。整个行动都是徒劳的，因为由3R组成的巫统基因是不容易摆脱的。更糟糕的是，王建民是否在砸自己的脚？
当他说行动党缺乏首相人选时，他可能让他的一些同僚感到不安。党内有不少杰出政治人物，有几人确实具备当首相的条件。
潜在的首相人选可能不是马来人或穆斯林，但更重要的是，他们是大马人，他们热衷于为大马人服务，改善制度和维护大马利益；不像大多数巫统政客，他们从政只是为了服务自己和迅速致富。他们的野心是以3P为指南：权力（Power）、地位（Position）和好处（Perk）。
看看凯里是否当首相的适当人选？
那么，王建民在凯里身上看到我们大多数人看不到的什么东西？他能否列举凯里自2013年成为内阁成员以来的卓越政治成就？
凯里有很多个人包袱，他的批评者声称，他在社会和政治阶梯上如鱼得水，是因为他是前首相的女婿。
王建民能否研究一下凯里的从政历史，并列出他在使大马成为一个对所有人都更好的国家方面的贡献？作为国会议员，凯里是否公开反对贪污、种族主义和宗教极端主义；这些如果不加以制止，就会毁掉国家。
凯里甚至没有勇气迈出大胆的一步，建议巫统成为一个不只是代表马来社会的政党。他曾经说过他想改革该党，但他仍然停留在以种族为基础的思维方式。
凯里是一个政治机会主义者，但他在第14届全国大选前的几个月作出了严重的误判。凯里肯定知道纳吉在一马发展公司（1MDB）案中已经走投无路，但他却避重就轻，支持纳吉（及他的配偶罗斯玛）。想象一下，当大马人在2018年投票给希盟时，凯里有多尴尬。
凯里没有骨气，他和纳吉的律师沙菲宜在全国跑透透，对时任反对党领袖安华恶语相向。人身攻击者不是当首相的料。
大约1亿零900万令吉从青体部失踪，虽然这发生在凯里成为体育部长前，但他一直对挪用钱的人的身份保持沉默。为什么？
2021年3月，作为科学、工艺及革新部长，凯里被评为国盟内阁中表现最好的部长。在《星洲日报》和《阳光日报》联合进行的民意调查中，凯里获得1万1125票的最高票数，但许多大马人对此表示怀疑。他们说，凯里的成功是由于“疫苗加持”，因为他是负责冠病疫苗接种计划的部长。批评者认为，如果没有冠病大流行，他的得分不会这么高。还有一个透明度的问题。
选首相最重要是看他用才学做了什么
也许，对王建民来说，发掘潜在首相人选的最好测试是举办一场拉菲兹和凯里的辩论会。然后，我们可以自己评估一下，哪位候选人具有正直、智慧和可信度。毕竟，重要的不是上什么大学，而是用学位做了什么，这才是最重要的。▉
DAP's Ong is wrong!
KJ is not PM material
By Mariam Mokhtar（Columnist）
Source:
sinchew.com.my/?p=4650403
(Mariam Mokhtar is a Freelance Writer.)
| 点击箭头聆听内容： |
What was former DAP MP for Bangi Ong Kian Ming thinking when he suggested
former Umno-Baru leaders Khairy Jamaluddin and Shahril Hamdan join DAP
because “the party needs prime minister candidates.”
Whilst taking part in a podcast called “Keluar Sekejap,” where the
discussions ranged from local issues to the three men’s break from active
politics, Khairy asked Ong whether he and Shahril should join DAP.
An expression of surprise and much laughter from the hosts accompanied Ong’s
reply when he agreed that both Khairy and Shahril should join DAP, because
they “both fit the bill,” and moreover, the party needed prime ministerial
candidates!
Was Ong joking or was he serious?
There must be at least one person with the charisma, the right credentials,
ideal character and proper qualifications to be PM in the pool of 15 million
Malaysians who are not under 18, or who are not over 70 years old.
Why did Ong have to choose these two? Khairy and Shahril are career
politicians who were subsequently rejected by their own party.
Malaysians are tired of the same old faces who lack fresh ideas. We want new
blood, and not former “has-beens.”
Was Ong being diplomatic or was he making a tactical move?
State elections are on the horizon and did Ong want to cultivate an image of
the DAP making overtures to Khairy and Shahril, and be seen as reaching out
to the Malay leaders in a spirit of political sportsmanship?
Was Ong trying to suggest that welcoming Khairy and Shahril into the DAP
fold meant that the party was willing to compromise and by the same token,
it would show that Khairy was amenable to shedding his former party’s
race-based roots?
No one should be that naive. The whole maneuver is an exercise in futility,
as the Umno-Baru genetic make-up, comprising the three Rs, is not easily
shed.
Worse still, did Ong shoot himself in the foot?
When he said DAP lacked prime ministerial candidates, he probably upset some
of his colleagues.
There are a number of outstanding politicians in the party and a few do have
what it takes to be PM. Ong is blind.
The potential PMs may not be Malay or Muslim, but more importantly, they are
Malaysian and are keen on serving Malaysians, improve the system and uphold
Malaysian interests, unlike most Umno-Baru politicians who merely enter
politics to serve themselves and get rich quickly.
Their ambitions are guided by the 3P’s: power, position and perks.
So, what does Ong see in Khairy that most of us cannot see? Could he list
Khairy’s outstanding political achievements ever since he became a member of
the cabinet in 2013?
Khairy has a lot of personal baggage and his critics claim that his meteoric
rise up the greasy social and political ladder was because he was the
son-in-law of a former PM.
Could Ong look into Khairy’s political history and list his contributions in
making Malaysia a better place for all?
As MP, did Khairy publicly voice out against the endemic corruption, racism
and religious extremism which if left unchecked will destroy this country?
Khairy doesn’t even have the courage to take the bold step of suggesting
Umno-Baru become a party which does not just represent only the Malay
community.
He once said he wanted to reform the party, but he is still stuck in a
race-based mindset.
Khairy is a political opportunist but he made a grave error of judgment in
the months before GE14.
He must have known that Najib was up-to-his-neck in the 1MDB fiasco, but
Khairy hedged his bets and backed Najib (and his spouse Rosmah), thinking
that the law would never catch up as long as Umno-Baru was in power.
Imagine Khairy’s shame when Malaysians voted PH in 2018.
Khairy has no backbone nor has he any integrity. He and Najib’s lawyer
Muhammad Shafee Abdullah went on a nationwide roadshow badmouthing the then
Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim in “Sodomy II.”
Character assassination is not PM material!
Around RM109 million went missing in the sports ministry, and although it
happened before Khairy was made the sports minister, he kept quiet about the
identity of the man who embezzled the money.
Why? Was this corrupt official well protected? Was he ever punished? Who is
he?
In March 2021, as the science, technology and innovation minister, Khairy
was voted the best performing minister in the Perikatan National (PN)
cabinet.
In a joint newspaper poll conducted by Sin Chew Daily and Sinar Harian,
Khairy received the highest score of 11,125 votes, but many Malaysians were
skeptical.
Khairy’s success, they said, was because of the “vaccine boost” as he was
the minister in charge of the coronavirus vaccination program.
The critics did not think he would have scored as highly if there had been
no coronavirus pandemic.
There is also the issue of transparency.
Perhaps, the best test for Ong to uncover a potential PM candidate is to
organize a debate between Rafizi Ramli and Khairy. Then we can evaluate for
ourselves the candidate with integrity, intellect and credibility.
After all, it is not the university one attends that matters; it is what one
does with the degree that is more important. ▉
0 comments:
Post a Comment