Wednesday 23 May 2018

20 groups: Civil society calls on new government to reform laws restricting freedom of expression and access to information

20 groups: Civil society calls on new government to reform laws 
restricting freedom of expression and access to information

May 22, 2018

Source: Article 19 website

Following the Malaysian people’s decision to vote for change in general elections held on 9 May, we the undersigned civil society organisations call on the incoming government to honor the mandate it has been given by implementing a comprehensive program of reform and strengthening human rights protections in Malaysia.

Over the decades of rule by the outgoing regime, authorities have frequently violated the right to freedom of opinion and expression and information, including by imposing legal restrictions on the exercise of the rights. The recent elections signal the Malaysian people’s rejection of the continued suppression of free speech in the country, and underscore the need for the new government to take action to fortify fundamental freedoms. Institutional and legal reforms are necessary to ensure that Malaysian citizens are better able to keep elected representatives and the three branches of power of government accountable and transparent through exercising their rights to freedom of opinion and expression.

Following the election victory of the Pakatan Harapan coalition, we welcome the new government’s quick formation of the Institutional Reforms Committee, which is tasked with making recommendations to the new government on priorities for legislative and structural reform. However, recent mixed messages from the ruling coalition on the repeal of the Anti-Fake News Act, passed by the outgoing government shortly before the election, give cause for concern. We believe that the more effective solution to any disinformation and misinformation is the enactment of a Freedom of Information Act at the federal level.

We urge the new government to prioritise reform of the country’s legislative framework in order to guarantee the rights to freedom of expression and information for all. However, legislative reform must go hand-in-hand with the restructuring of national institutions to ensure accountability, independence, and respect for human rights. Moreover, the new government must meaningfully engage civil society in a program of reform that is inclusive and participatory.

For these reasons, we the undersigned civil society organisations suggest to the Institutional Reform Committee and the Pakatan Harapan government the following road map for reforms relating to the rights to freedom of expression and access to information.

We urge the Malaysian government to:

As soon as possible, consult with civil society organisations on the shortcomings of Malaysia’s legal framework as they relate to freedom of expression and access to information

We call upon the government to ensure that any legislative and institutional reform processes are transparent and provide for the full and effective participation of all concerned stakeholders, including civil society. The government must carry out meaningful consultations with civil society, including human rights defenders, journalists, artists, bloggers and other advocates for freedom of expression and access to information. The Inclusion of civil society perspectives in discussions about reforms will help ensure that new laws and policies reflect the needs of Malaysian society and are in line with human rights principles and standards.

Promptly end blocking of new sites

We call upon the government to lift barriers on access to websites, including news sites, arbitrarily imposed by the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC). The MCMC has used broad powers to block websites reporting on the 1MDB corruption scandal, including the UK-based Sarawak Report and regional news outlet The Asia Sentinel. We welcome the decision of the MCMC to unblock Sarawak Report and The Medium on 17 Mei 2018. The government should ensure that Malaysians are able to, in line with international standards, freely access information and express themselves online without restrictions. Any blocking orders must fully comply with international human rights standards and include procedural safeguards.

Immediately lift all arbitrary travel bans

We welcome the Immigration Department’s 14 May decision to lift the travel ban against cartoonist and activist Zunar, who faces charges of sedition for comments made on Twitter. The new government should immediately lift any remaining travel bans imposed on human rights defenders, elected representatives or others because of their exercise of the right to freedom of expression or as part of a crackdown on dissent, and end the use of such bans to stifle criticism.

During the upcoming parliamentary session, reform or repeal laws violating freedom of expression

We call on the new government to immediately reform or repeal repressive laws that have been used to restrict freedom of expression. The following laws, which have been frequently used to stifle criticism and dissent, must be prioritised for reform or repeal during the first parliamentary session under the new government:

  • The Sedition Act 1948, which authorities have used to prosecute politicians, human rights defenders, cartoonists and others for expressing opinions critical of the government ,royalty and of religions.
  • The Anti-Fake News Act 2018, which defines “fake news” broadly, imposes criminal penalties for those involved in its dissemination, and gives government authorities broad censorship powers.
  • The Official Secrets Act 1972, a broadly-worded law backed by criminal sanctions, that entrenches a culture of secrecy in all matters relating to public administration and gives state authorities prerogative to withhold an expansive range of information from public view without judicial scrutiny.
  • The Peaceful Assembly Act (PAA) 2012, which has frequently been used to investigate and intimidate organisers of protests , often for their failure to provide authorities notice 10 days prior to an assembly.
  • Section 233 of Communication and Multimedia Act 1998, which provides criminal penalties for online communications that are “obscene, indecent, false, menacing offensive in nature with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass a person” and has become a chief law used for imprisoning those who criticise authority and power for their exercise of the right to freedom of expression.
  • The Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984, which grants the Home Minister “absolute discretion” to ban or censor “undesirable publications” based on vaguely worded criteria and has been used to suppress political opposition, to ban books that may be critical of the government or considered to be blasphemous to Islam, and to curtail freedom of expression in general.
  • The Film Censorship Act 2002, the Act criminalises the circulation, distribution, display, production, sale or hire of any film not approved by the Film Censorship Board of Malaysia and extends this prohibition to the possession of such material.

The reform or repeal of these laws have been repeatedly raised by Malaysian lawmakers, human rights groups and also UN Special Rapporteurs as essential to safeguarding freedom of expression in the country.

Before Malaysia’s UPR, sign and ratify key international human rights instruments

Malaysia has yet to ratify many key human rights treaties, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Although the previous government accepted recommendations to consider ratification of the ICCPR during its previous Universal Periodic Review (UPR) at the UN Human Rights Council, it has made no progress toward this goal and has instead advanced laws and policies which further undermine the rights enshrined in the treaty.

Therefore, we call upon the government to fulfil its commitments by signing and ratifying treaties including the ICCPR, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), and the International Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) prior to its UPR at the Human Rights Council in November 2018. In order to demonstrate its commitment to creating an environment which safeguards human rights of all, the government should also issue a standing invitation to all special procedures of the UN Human Rights Council and prioritise visits for the Special Rapporteurs on freedom of opinion and expression, on freedom of peaceful assembly and of association, on human rights defenders, and on freedom of religion or belief.

Within this year, introduce a Parliamentary Select Committee

The new government has promised to govern by the rule of law and ensure the separation of powers and to this end must strengthen parliamentary processes and institutions. We therefore call upon Parliament to establish a Parliamentary Select Committee to ensure effective checks and balances and to safeguard the public interest against the abuse of power.

We encourage a specific Parliamentary Select Committee to be provided with a mandate that includes the review of problematic laws and provisions that have been used to curtail freedom of expression and information, including Penal Code sections 124(b), 186, and 505(b); the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (SOSMA), Bernama Act, The Whistleblower Protection Act 2010, and National Security Council Act 2016 (NSC).  At the same time, we hope the Select Committee will consider recommending the enactment of a Right to Public Information Law as a way of guaranteeing openness, transparency and good governance.

As part of reform efforts, take steps to strengthen and empower SUHAKAM

While carrying out reform initiatives, we call upon the government to consider recommendations made by the National Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) with regards to adherence to Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We also urge the new government to ensure that SUHAKAM’s annual report is debated in Parliament each year.

The new government must also take steps to ensure that SUHAKAM is fully independent and has the authority and resources it needs to effectively investigate and address violations of the right to freedom of opinion and expression.

Signatories:
ARTICLE 19
Agora Society
Aliran Kesedaran Negara (ALIRAN)
Art For Grabs
Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ), Malaysia
CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation
ENGAGE
Freedom Film Network
GERAK
Justice for Sisters
Malaysian Atheists and Secular Humanists (MASH)
Persatuan Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor (EMPOWER)
Persatuan Sahabat Wanita Selangor
Pusat KOMAS
Sahabat Rakyat 人民之友
Seksualiti Merdeka
Sinar Project
Sisters In Islam (SIS)
Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM)
Writer Alliance for Media Independence ( WAMI)

Contact
Nalini Elumalai, Program Officer at ARTICLE 19, 01136535927 or nalini@article19.org

0 comments:

通告 Notification

安华接受CCTV独家专访 

点击下图,观赏视频




工委会议决:将徐袖珉除名

人民之友工委会2020年9月27日常月会议针对徐袖珉(英文名: See Siew Min)半年多以来胡闹的问题,议决如下:

鉴于徐袖珉长期以来顽固推行她的“颜色革命”理念和“舔美仇华”思想,蓄意扰乱人民之友一贯以来的“反对霸权主义,反对种族主义”政治立场,阴谋分化甚至瓦解人民之友推动真正民主改革的思想阵地,人民之友工委会经过长时间的考察和验证,在2020年9月27日会议议决;为了明确人民之友创立以来的政治立场以及贯彻人民之友现阶段以及今后的政治主张,必须将徐袖珉从工委会名单上除名,并在人民之友部落格发出通告,以绝后患。

2020年9月27日发布



[ 漫画新解 ]
新冠病毒疫情下的马来西亚
舔美精神患者的状态

年轻一辈人民之友有感而作


注:这“漫画新解”是反映一名自诩“智慧高人一等”而且“精于民主理论”的老姐又再突发奇想地运用她所学会的一丁点“颜色革命”理论和伎俩来征服人民之友队伍里的学弟学妹们的心理状态——她在10多年前曾在队伍里因时时表现自己是超群精英,事事都要别人服从她的意愿而人人“惊而远之”,她因此而被挤出队伍近10年之久。

她在三年前被一名年长工委推介,重新加入人民之友队伍。可是,就在今年年初她又再故态复萌,尤其是在3月以来,不断利用部落格的贴文,任意扭曲而胡说八道。起初,还以“不同意见者”的姿态出现,以博取一些不明就里的队友对她的同情和支持,后来,她发现了她的欺骗伎俩无法得逞之后,索性撤下了假面具,对人民之友一贯的“反对霸权主义、反对种族主义”的政治立场,发出歇斯底里的叫嚣,而暴露她设想人民之友“改旗易帜”的真面目!

尤其是在新冠病毒疫情(COVID-19)课题上,她公然猖狂跟人民之友的政治立场对着干,指责人民之友服务于中国文宣或大中华,是 “中国海外统治部”、“中华小红卫兵”等等等等。她甚至通过强硬粗暴手段擅自把我们的WhatsApp群组名称“Sahabat Rakyat Malaysia”改为“吐槽美国样衰俱乐部”这样的无耻行动也做得出来。她的这种种露骨的表现足以说明了她是一名赤裸裸的“反中仇华”份子。

其实,在我们年轻队友看来,这名嘲讽我们“浪费了20年青春”[人民之友成立至今近20年(2001-9-9迄今)]并想要“拯救我们年轻工委”的这位“徐大姐”,她的思想依然停留在20年前的上个世纪。她初始或许是不自觉接受了“西方民主”和“颜色革命”思想的培养,而如今却是自觉地为维护美国的全球霸权统治而与反对美国霸权支配全球的中国人民和全世界各国(包括马来西亚)人民为敌。她是那么狂妄自大,却是多么幼稚可笑啊!

她所说的“你们浪费了20年青春”正好送回给她和她的跟班,让他们把她的这句话吞到自己的肚子里去!


[ 漫画新解 ]
新冠病毒疫情下的马来西亚
"公知"及其跟班的精神面貌

注:这“漫画新解”是与<人民之友>4月24日转贴的美国政客叫嚣“围剿中国”煽动颠覆各国民间和组织 >(原标题为<当心!爱国队伍里混进了这些奸细……>)这篇文章有关联的。这篇文章作者沈逸所说的“已被欧美政治认同洗脑的‘精神欧美人’”正是马来西亚“公知”及其跟班的精神面貌的另一种写照!




[ 漫画新解 ]
新冠病毒疫情下的马来西亚
"舔美"狗狗的角色

编辑 / 来源:人民之友 / 网络图库

注:这“漫画新解”是与《察网》4月22日刊林爱玥专栏文章<公知与鲁迅之间 隔着整整一个中国 >这篇文章有关联的,这是由于这篇文章所述说的中国公知,很明显是跟这组漫画所描绘的马来西亚的“舔美”狗狗,有着孪生兄弟姐妹的亲密关系。

欲知其中详情,敬请点击、阅读上述文章内容,再理解、品味以下漫画的含义。这篇文章和漫画贴出后,引起激烈反响,有人竟然对号入座,暴跳如雷且发出恐吓,众多读者纷纷叫好且鼓励加油。编辑部特此接受一名网友建议:在显著的布告栏内贴出,方便网友搜索、浏览,以扩大宣传教育效果。谢谢关注!谢谢鼓励!












Malaysia Time (GMT+8)

面书分享 FB SHARE