Wednesday, 18 January 2012

13GE DEMAND #1: ERADICATE INSTITUTIONAL RACISM

13GE DEMAND #1: ERADICATE INSTITUTIONAL RACISM

By Kua Kia Soong, Director of SUARAM, 18 January 2012

Picture above show the stage of "Institutionalized Racism In Malaysia" public forum which held on 17th January 2012 at KLSACH. From left: Mr.N.Ganesan, National Advisor to Hindraf , Moderator Dr. Lim Teck Ghee, Director of Centre for Policy Initiatives, Dr. Kua Kia Soong, Director Suaram and Dr Azmi Sharom, Academic.

With the 13th general elections just round the corner, it is time for Malaysians to bring the big issues before the prospective candidates and their parties and to register their commitments to these demands of the Malaysian people. These issues are what the politicians should be debating and each candidate and political party should register their stand on each of these concrete demands. Most of these concrete demands can be delivered very quickly and we will be monitoring closely to see if the candidates/parties carry them out. The simple rule is:

IF THE CANDIDATE DOES NOT SUPPORT OUR DEMANDS, DON’T VOTE FOR THAT CANDIDATE!

IF A PARTY DOES NOT COMMIT TO CARRYING OUT OUR DEMANDS, DON’T VOTE FOR THAT PARTY!

The first demand is for the eradication of “institutional racism” that has been entrenched in our country ever since the May 13 Incident of 1969 led to a fait accompli situation for UMNO/BN to introduce the “New Economic Policy”. 

Institutional racism may be defined as:

“… that which, covertly or overtly, resides in the policies, procedures, operations and culture of public or private institutions – reinforcing individual prejudices and being reinforced by them in turn.” (A. Sivanandan, Director of the Institute of Race Relations, UK)

This seems like a concise working definition to look at the many examples of institutional racism in Malaysia that has been rampant ever since the “New Economic Policy” was put in place by the then emergent state capitalists in UMNO in 1971.

The British reneged on civil liberties

Institutional racism in Malaysia has come about through the British colonial power reneging on their post-war promises of equal rights for all Malayans after the reaction of the Malay aristocracy to the Malayan Union proposals in 1946.

Even so, the inclusion of Article 153 on the “special position of the Malays” has been interpreted by the Umnoputras all these years in their own fashion, clean from the purpose of the original intent. Since the promulgation of the “New Economic Policy”, they have been using “Bumiputraism” as a populist ideology to gain Malay voters’ support as well as a convenient way to accumulate their capital stake in the economy.

Article 153 abused after 1971

The 1971 amendments to Article 153, namely, (8A) on the “quota system”, have likewise been implemented by UMNO according to its whims and fancies, instead of proportionately on a faculty basis and sparingly as directed “by the Yang di-Pertuan Agung”.

The blatant racial discrimination in development policies since 1971 have been seen in projects such as the FELDA schemes, Petronas and others involving share allocations and the bestowing of privatized projects.

No non-bumis allowed in UiTM

In education policy, the proud boast by the Higher Education minister, Shafie Salleh at the UMNO General Assembly in 2004 that he would not allow a single Non-Bumiputera to enter UiTM is perhaps the most blatant admission of racial discrimination in a public sector institution. But similar racial discrimination has existed for years since 1971 in other institutions paid for by Malaysian tax payers.

Discrimination in civil & armed services

Institutional racism has existed in the civil and armed services since May 13, 1969. Thus, while there were 30% Chinese in the civil service and 40% Chinese in the RMAF in 1960; today the proportion of Chinese in the civil service has fallen to below 5% while the proportion of Chinese in the armed forces is below 2% if that!

Racist indoctrination in public institutions

The more pernicious form of institutional racism has been the racist indoctrination that has been seen or exposed in UMNO general assemblies, the Biro Tatatertib Negara, school textbooks and other institutions. In these institutions, racist ideas of “pendatang” (them) and “Ketuanan Melayu”(us) have been overtly and covertly propagated while the BN is portrayed as the defender of “Ketuanan Melayu”. The recent “Interlok” controversy is merely a latterday phenomenon that has been propagated in public institutions since 1971.

Racism against Indians

While the Chinese and Indians have been portrayed in the official propaganda as the “pendatang” (immigrants) as opposed to the bumiputras who are supposed to be “princes of the soil”, in recent years Indians have borne the brunt of official racism as can be seen in the statistics on deaths in police custody and deaths through police shootings. Indians have been marginalized through the neglect of the plantations sector and their displacement as urban settlers in recent decades.

Fascism of the far-right

The far-right in this country has been getting away with impunity. The historical blight of May 13, 1969 on the national conscience has to be cleansed through a truth and reconciliation commission. There also has to be a public inquiry into the even more recent racist murders at Kampong Medan in 2001. An Equality & Human Rights Commission should ensure that the racist outburst that we saw by UMNO leaders in Kampung Baru in 1987, at the Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall against Suqiu in 1999, and the racist rallies such as the Malay Action Front in 2001 are prohibited and adequately dealt with.

Eradicate institutional racism

Thus, “Eradicate institutional racism” should be the first of our 13th general election demands with the following concrete demands:
  • Abolish the “New Economic Policy” - corrective action in all economic and education policies must be based on need or sector or class and not on race with priority given to indigenous people, marginalised and poor communities;
  •  Repeal amendment (8A) of Article 153 that was passed during the state of emergency in 1971 and was not in the original 1957 federal constitution;
  • Institutionalize means testing for any access to scholarships or other entitlements;
  •  Implement merit-based recruitment in civil & armed services;
  • Enact an Equality Act to promote equality and non-discrimination irrespective of race, creed, religion, gender or disability with provision for an Equality & Human Rights Commission;
  • Promote equality & human rights education in schools, unions, institutions;
  • Ratify the Convention on the Eradication of Racial Discrimination (CERD), the International Covenant on Civil & Political Rights and Economic, Social & Cultural Rights.

    0 comments:

    通告 Notification




    工委会议决:将徐袖珉除名

    人民之友工委会2020年9月27日常月会议针对徐袖珉(英文名: See Siew Min)半年多以来胡闹的问题,议决如下:

    鉴于徐袖珉长期以来顽固推行她的“颜色革命”理念和“舔美仇华”思想,蓄意扰乱人民之友一贯以来的“反对霸权主义,反对种族主义”政治立场,阴谋分化甚至瓦解人民之友推动真正民主改革的思想阵地,人民之友工委会经过长时间的考察和验证,在2020年9月27日会议议决;为了明确人民之友创立以来的政治立场以及贯彻人民之友现阶段以及今后的政治主张,必须将徐袖珉从工委会名单上除名,并在人民之友部落格发出通告,以绝后患。

    2020年9月27日发布



    [ 漫画新解 ]
    新冠病毒疫情下的马来西亚
    舔美精神患者的状态

    年轻一辈人民之友有感而作


    注:这“漫画新解”是反映一名自诩“智慧高人一等”而且“精于民主理论”的老姐又再突发奇想地运用她所学会的一丁点“颜色革命”理论和伎俩来征服人民之友队伍里的学弟学妹们的心理状态——她在10多年前曾在队伍里因时时表现自己是超群精英,事事都要别人服从她的意愿而人人“惊而远之”,她因此而被挤出队伍近10年之久。

    她在三年前被一名年长工委推介,重新加入人民之友队伍。可是,就在今年年初她又再故态复萌,尤其是在3月以来,不断利用部落格的贴文,任意扭曲而胡说八道。起初,还以“不同意见者”的姿态出现,以博取一些不明就里的队友对她的同情和支持,后来,她发现了她的欺骗伎俩无法得逞之后,索性撤下了假面具,对人民之友一贯的“反对霸权主义、反对种族主义”的政治立场,发出歇斯底里的叫嚣,而暴露她设想人民之友“改旗易帜”的真面目!

    尤其是在新冠病毒疫情(COVID-19)课题上,她公然猖狂跟人民之友的政治立场对着干,指责人民之友服务于中国文宣或大中华,是 “中国海外统治部”、“中华小红卫兵”等等等等。她甚至通过强硬粗暴手段擅自把我们的WhatsApp群组名称“Sahabat Rakyat Malaysia”改为“吐槽美国样衰俱乐部”这样的无耻行动也做得出来。她的这种种露骨的表现足以说明了她是一名赤裸裸的“反中仇华”份子。

    其实,在我们年轻队友看来,这名嘲讽我们“浪费了20年青春”[人民之友成立至今近20年(2001-9-9迄今)]并想要“拯救我们年轻工委”的这位“徐大姐”,她的思想依然停留在20年前的上个世纪。她初始或许是不自觉接受了“西方民主”和“颜色革命”思想的培养,而如今却是自觉地为维护美国的全球霸权统治而与反对美国霸权支配全球的中国人民和全世界各国(包括马来西亚)人民为敌。她是那么狂妄自大,却是多么幼稚可笑啊!

    她所说的“你们浪费了20年青春”正好送回给她和她的跟班,让他们把她的这句话吞到自己的肚子里去!


    [ 漫画新解 ]
    新冠病毒疫情下的马来西亚
    "公知"及其跟班的精神面貌

    注:这“漫画新解”是与<人民之友>4月24日转贴的美国政客叫嚣“围剿中国”煽动颠覆各国民间和组织 >(原标题为<当心!爱国队伍里混进了这些奸细……>)这篇文章有关联的。这篇文章作者沈逸所说的“已被欧美政治认同洗脑的‘精神欧美人’”正是马来西亚“公知”及其跟班的精神面貌的另一种写照!




    [ 漫画新解 ]
    新冠病毒疫情下的马来西亚
    "舔美"狗狗的角色

    编辑 / 来源:人民之友 / 网络图库

    注:这“漫画新解”是与《察网》4月22日刊林爱玥专栏文章<公知与鲁迅之间 隔着整整一个中国 >这篇文章有关联的,这是由于这篇文章所述说的中国公知,很明显是跟这组漫画所描绘的马来西亚的“舔美”狗狗,有着孪生兄弟姐妹的亲密关系。

    欲知其中详情,敬请点击、阅读上述文章内容,再理解、品味以下漫画的含义。这篇文章和漫画贴出后,引起激烈反响,有人竟然对号入座,暴跳如雷且发出恐吓,众多读者纷纷叫好且鼓励加油。编辑部特此接受一名网友建议:在显著的布告栏内贴出,方便网友搜索、浏览,以扩大宣传教育效果。谢谢关注!谢谢鼓励!












    Malaysia Time (GMT+8)

    面书分享 FB SHARE