茜蒂卡欣（Siti Kasim）批马智礼言论：
固打制是为巩固执政权位，
侮辱不依靠政府马来群体！
综合《星洲日报》报道与茜蒂脸书帖文
“你（马智礼）讲到好像所有非土著都很富有所以必须保持固打制，你举例政府及私人大学的分别。你说私人大学多数是非土著学生，因为他们比马来人更好，我无法相信这番话从教育部长口中说出。”
她在脸书帖文表示，2015年国会书面回答的数据显示，在20%高收入群体（T20）中，土著家庭占53.81%、华裔占37.05%、印裔占8.80%和其他群体占0.34% 。
她说，如果只是以土著群体内部作为比较，T20只占16.34%、中等收入M40群体占38.96%，低收入B40群体占多数，即44.7%。
茜蒂卡欣指出，华裔群体的内部比较为，T20占29.66%、M40占42.32%，B40占28.02%；而印裔群体的内部比较为，T20占21.98%、M40占41.31%，B40占38.71%。
“为何如此？你应该调查这方面的差距，而不是将矛头指向其他不依靠政府，努力提升自己的其他大马人。”
非土著省俭送孩子到私立或国外大学
她说，私人大学有很多非土著学生基于一个很简单的原因，即非土著无法负担将孩子送到国外的大学的费用，因为大部分（如果不是全部）的奖学金都给土著。
“他们因为固打制而无法进入政府大学，即使成绩比土著更优秀；那马智礼你希望他们去哪里？”
她表示，她知道有很多非土著省吃俭用以确保可以将孩子送到本地或海外大学深造；很多非土著生育较少孩子，因为他们知道未来需要承担孩子的教育费用。
非土著家长无法获得政府的任何资助
她以本身为例子表示，很多非土著家长带孩子到社团、银行等寻求教育费用方面协助，因为他们无法获得政府的任何资助。
“我就是其中一个家长，将我的女儿送到本地的国际大学，我需要贷款来缴付我女儿的学费，我很幸运因为我有一个慷慨的华裔客户，他怜悯我，并提供我免利息贷款来缴付我女儿的教育费用。”
利于巫裔的计划是获取选票可靠方式
茜蒂卡欣说，利于巫裔的计划曾被视为改善大马最不富裕的种族群体的必要条件，但可以看出，这些计划只让巫裔群体内的富裕群体受惠，贫困群体仍然一无所获。
她认为，这些计划依然存在，因为政治人物认为这是可以获得选票的可靠方式。
茜蒂卡欣脸书上的原文（全文）
ON MASZLEE AND QUOTA IN EDUCATION
- Race-based affirmative action is failing poor Malaysians
- Race-based affirmative action is failing poor Malaysians
By Siti Kasim
Maszlee,
I am shocked to see this video clip of you. You speak as if all of the non-bumis are rich therefore the quota must remain. You gave example the difference between public and private universities. You said the private universities are mostly filled with non-bumis because they are better off than the Malays. I can't believe this is coming out from our Education Minister!!!
It is not true all non-bumis are rich therefore the quotas must remain to enable the Bumis to compete on an equal footing. Not only you are insulting the many hard-working Malay parents who do not rely on government handouts but also to the Malays in general to compete on their own merit.
Figures provided by Parliament in 2015, showed that Bumiputera households make up the majority of the country's top 20 percent income earners (T20), but the community also sees the widest intra-group income disparity. According to data from a parliamentary written reply, the bumiputera make up 53.81 percent of the T20 category, followed by Chinese at 37.05 percent, Indians at 8.80 percent and others at 0.34 percent.
However, when the comparison is made within the bumiputera group itself, T20 earners only comprise 16.34 percent. The remaining comprises the middle 40 percent income earners (M40) at 38.96 percent and the bottom 40 percent income earners (B40) making up the majority at 44.7 percent. Why is this? You should look into this disparity instead of pointing fingers to other Malaysians who work hard to uplift themselves without any help from their own government.
This is in contrast with the Chinese and Indian communities, where the M40 group makes up the majority. Within the Chinese community, the T20 group makes up 29.66 percent, followed by the M40 group at 42.32 percent and B40 at 28.02 percent. As for the Indian community, the T40 group stands at 19.98 percent, followed by the M40 income earners at 41.31 percent and the B40 at 38.71 percent.
Why do the private universities are filled with non-bumis for a very simple reason because they can't afford to send their children to overseas universities. Most if not all of the scholarships are given to Bumis. They can't gain entry to public universities due to the quotas despite having better results than Bumis. Where do you expect them to go then Maszlee? I know of many non-bumis who are scraping their barrels to ensure they send their kids to further their studies either local or overseas. Many of them have less children because they know they will have to pay for their kid's education in the future.
I am one of the parent that send my daughter to study in the International local university. I have to borrow money to pay for my daughter's university fees. I am lucky I have a kind Chinese client who takes pity on me and gave me a loan without interest to pay for my daughter's education. This is because he thinks education is important. I struggled to ensure I keep up the payment and with God's will, I paid up the loan. I am sure many non-bumi parents do the same as me through their Chinese associations, banks, etc... because they cannot get any help from their own government.
In any event, I think my fellow non-Bumi Malaysians don't despair, Maszlee can stuff his matriculation quotas as doing STPM is equivalent to A-Level and more marketable to any local or overseas universities.
By the way your claim that the foreign university branches in Malaysia is filled up by non-bumis as somehow the reason Malays need more places in public universities via matriculation is a boldface lie. Monash was opened in KL in 1998 and Nottingham in 2000; matriculation as you said started in 1999. I cannot believe that you are the Minister of Education. Where did you learn to lie like this? Joseph Goebbels?
Schemes favouring Malays were once deemed essential to improve the lot of Malaysia’s least wealthy racial group; but as can be seen this scheme is to help the well-off within the Malay group, while failing the poor. Yet affirmative action persists because it is a reliable vote-winner for these politicians. #
0 comments:
Post a Comment