Saturday, 18 May 2019

Education minister Maszlee ‘no different’ from BN politicians, claims Penang DCM / 槟第二副首长公开批马智礼, 跟国阵政客“没有什么不同”

Education minister Maszlee ‘no different’ from BN politicians, claims Penang DCM

BY OPALYN MOK

Published 9 hours ago on 17 May 2019


Penang second Deputy Chief Minister P. Ramasamy says some ministers are no different from those in power they replaced in using race and religion to ensure their political survival. 

GEORGE TOWN, May 17 ― P. Ramasamy today described fellow Pakatan Harapan (PH) colleague Maszlee Malik as “no different” from Barisan Nasional (BN) politicians after the education minister’s remarks about the matriculation quota and alleged private sector biases against Bumiputera jobseekers.

The Penang second deputy chief minister said some ministers and gave the example of Maszlee, are no different from those in power they replaced in using race and religion to ensure their political survival.

“It is shocking that Maszlee could link the continuation of the matriculation quota on the existence of unfair employment system for Bumiputera in the private sector,” the DAP lawmaker said in a statement.

Ramasamy was responding to Maszlee’s reported remarks that Bumiputera were denied job opportunities because they were Mandarin illiterate nor could they speak the language in justifying the government’s decision to keep the present matriculation quota system.

“So he says as long as the private sector, in other words, Chinese employers, are only recruiting on the basis of knowledge of Mandarin, then the government will maintain the present matriculation quota.

 “But now, there is realisation that some of our ministers like Maszlee are no different from the BN era politicians who used race and religion to ensure their political survival,” Ramasamy said.

He then accused Maszlee of being “entrapped in thinking along racial lines”.

“What is the difference between him and Umno politicians?” he then asked.

Ramasamy said that the employment of Bumiputera in the private sector would have been raised in Cabinet if there was a real problem.

“Why is he raising the matter in the public, does he want to score some political points in a predominantly Malay crowd?” he asked.

He said when PH won the government, some would expect racial policies in education and other areas would be in the past, but added that it was not the case with the matriculation system.

Ramasamy said a recent survey indicated that Indians face the most discrimination in the private sector while the public sector is completely monopolised by the Bumiputera.

“If this is so, what action the government is doing to rectify the situation rather to link it to the matriculation quota system?” he asked.

He pointed out that the employment of the ethnic Chinese and Indians is limited in the public sector.

He asked Maszlee if the ministry would take the initiative to change the quota system since Bumiputera constitute the vast majority of employees in the public sector.

“Maszlee after having said much on the colour of school shoes and the weight of bags seems to have nothing much to add in terms of forward looking policies to propel the education system,” he added.

He accused Maszlee of behaving like Umno politicians who think that race and religion are needed to safeguard his position in the current government.

“Well, with politicians like Maszlee, PH can say goodbye to bring about policies and reforms to move the nation ahead,” he said.

Yesterday, during a forum with university students at USM, Maszlee responded to a question on the matriculation quota by stating that the quota system should not be looked at in isolation as there were Bumiputera being denied jobs because they don’t know Mandarin.

“If we can make do without all that, if we can give equal business opportunities, then we can talk about being fair to all,” he reportedly said.
....................................................................................................................................................................................

槟第二副首长公开批马智礼,
  跟国阵政客“没有什么不同”

作者/来源:OPALYN MOK/<马来邮报>

槟州第二副首席部长拉玛萨米(P. Ramasamy)指责马智礼(Maszlee Malik)表现得像巫统政客,跟他们同样需要利用种族和宗教来维护他本身在现任政府中的地位。

[乔治市5月17日讯]  针对教育部长关于我国大学预科班限额(固打)和声称私人企业对土著求职者的排斥的谈话,槟州第二副首席部长拉玛萨米(P. Ramasamy)今日评论他的希盟同僚马智礼跟国阵政客“没有什么不同”。

槟城第二副首席部长说,一些部长(他举马智礼为例)跟他们取代的在前朝利用种族和宗教来取得他们的政治生存的部长没有什么不同。

这名民主行动党的立法议员在他的一份声明中说,“马智礼竟然可以将大学预科班限额的延续,跟私人企业里存在的对土著不公平的雇用制度相提并论,真是令人震惊”。

拉玛萨米是回应马智礼的公开谈话。马智礼说,土著因为不谙华语(指普通话)而失去就业机会,政府就因为他们(土著)不懂华语华文,而决定必须保持现有的大学预科班限额的制度。

“所以他说,只要私人企业,换句话说就是华人雇主,仅根据华语知识的基础来雇用员工,那么政府就将维持现有的大学预科班限额的制度。”

“但是现在,人们已经意识到,像马智礼这样的一些部长,跟使用种族和宗教来确保他们的政治生存的国阵时代的政客没有什么不同,”拉马萨米说。

他指责马智礼“陷入了种族路线思维”。

他随后问道“马智礼和巫统的政客有什么不同?”。

拉玛萨米说,如果土著在私人企业就业出现真正的问题,就应该向内阁提出。

“为什么他在公众场合提出这个问题?他是否想在马来族群中获得一些政治加分?”他问道。

他说,当希盟上台执政时,有许多人期望教育和其他领域的种族政策将会废除,但补充说,大学预科班限额的制度并非如此。

拉马萨米说,最近的一项调查显示,印度人在私人企业面临的歧视最为严重,而公共部门完全为土著所垄断。

“如果是这样,那么政府正在采取什么行动来纠正这种情况,而不是将它跟大学预科班限额制度相提并论?”他问道。

他指出,华人和印度人在公共部门就业机会是非常有限的。

他问马智礼,既然土著在公共部门就业占了绝大多数,教育部是否会主动改变非土著的限额制度?

他补充说,“马智礼说了许多关于学校鞋子的颜色和书包的重量以外,似乎也没有提出什么前瞻性政策可以用来推动教育的发展”

他指责马智礼表现得像巫统政客,跟他们同样需要利用种族和宗教来维护他本身在现任政府中的地位。

他说,“好吧!有了像马智礼这样的政客,希盟可以向‘制定改革政策、推动国家发展’告别了。”

昨天,马智礼在马来西亚理科大学(USM)举办的一个大学生论坛上,回答一个关于大学预科班限额的问题。他说,大学预科班限额的问题不应该孤立看待,这是因为土著由于不谙华语而无法获得工作机会的事实存在。

他根据传闻说,“如果我们能够做到这一点,如果我们可以提供平等的商业机会,那么我们就可以谈论对所有人公平。”

0 comments:

通告 Notification


成立18周年纪念,9月21日举办论坛

我们决定举办“‘509改朝换代’马哈迪当政,民主改革运动前进抑或倒退?”论坛与自由餐会,作为我们今年(2019年)纪念人民之友成立18周年的活动内容。以下4名专人欣然接受作为论坛的主讲人:
  • 兴权会2.0领导乌达雅古玛 (P. Uthayakumar)
  • 人权律师西蒂卡欣 (Siti Kasim)
  • 自由撰稿人及评论人唐南发(Josh Hong)
  • 媒体工作者及评论人蓝志锋(Lum Chih Feng)
4名主讲人将针对论坛主题分别出具论文,发表讲话,并回答现场问题。我们会在论坛过后,将主讲人的专题文章和讲话视频,上载到人民之友部落格(sahabatrakyatmy.blogspot.com),供公众阅览。我们希望通过此论坛激发更多的民主党团领导、学者、各阶层人士,共同为我国民主改革运动做出更大的努力和贡献。

论坛举办日期:2019年9月21日(星期六),时间:下午2:00—5:30时分,地点:柔佛古来,新国泰餐馆。论坛结束后才进行简单的自由餐会,同时进行互相交流。我们欢迎关心我国政治发展的公众人士前来聆听论坛主讲人的演讲并参加自由餐会(入场免费,但请事先报名参加,以便准备食物。有意参加者请填上表格https://forms.gle/SWbjEaiwNikEUiKF6或联系以下负责人)。

9月9日张贴一篇具参考价值英译文章

我们已在今年9月9日(成立纪念日)这天,发表人民之友秘书处委派人员翻译的一篇新加坡前工会领袖庄明湖2013年所撰写的《廿世纪六十年代新加坡左派工运遭遇问题探索(续篇)》(原是华文版)的英文译稿,作为人民之友18周年纪念的一个献礼——提供一个新马人民反殖独立运动遭遇敌人从内部破坏的历史殷鉴,为在9月21日举行的论坛所探索的现实课题,增添一份具有启示意义的参考材料。

“人民之友”是一个着重促进我国民主人权运动的思想交流平台。人民之友工委会都是义务的自愿工作者,我们坚持独立自主的立场,我们采取自力更生、节约苦干的方针,为推动我国民主人权运动朝向正确方向发展而奋斗。我们欢迎“有心人”赞助我们的这项活动及其他工作,有意赞助者请联系:

(1)朱信杰 017-7721511
(2)钟立薇 012-7177187
(3)吴振宇 013-7778320


Forum to be held on 21 September in commemoration of 18th anniversary

We will be organising “Mahathir returns to power after regime change in the 14th General Election, A progression or regression of the democratic reform movement?” forum cum buffet in commemoration of our 18th Anniversary. The following 4 experts have accepted the invitation to become our panel speakers:
  • P. Uthayakumar – Leader of Hindraf 2.0
  • Siti Kasim – Human rights lawyer
  • Josh Hong - Freelance writer and commentator
  • Lum Chih Feng – Media worker and commentator
All 4 panel speakers will present papers, deliver speeches and answer questions on the theme of the forum. After the event, we will also be uploading the paper and video of the speeches of the panel speakers to Sahabat Rakyat blog(sahabatrakyatmy.blogspot.com)as reference material for the public. Through this forum, we hope to inspire more leaders of democratic parties, organisations, scholars and peoples of all walks of life to make more contribution to the democratic reform movement of our country.

Particulars of the event are as follows:
Date: 21 September 2019 (Saturday)
Time: 2:00pm – 5:30pm
Venue: Cathay Restaurant Kulai, Johor
Buffet will start upon the completion of the forum, concurrent with the sharing session
. We welcome all who are concerned with the political developments in Malaysia to attend this event and join the buffet meal. (Admission is free, but please register in advance so that we can make necessary arrangement for food. If you are interested, please fill in https://forms.gle/SWbjEaiwNikEUiKF6or contact person in charge below)

9 September - Published the English rendition of an article of value for reference

On 9 September this year (the actual day of our anniversary), we had published an English rendition of the "Probing into the sufferings of Singapore's left-wing labour movement in the 1960s (Part II)" originally written in Chinese by Chng Min Oh, a former trade union leader in Singapore on Sahabat Rakyat blog, as a gift of our anniversary. This English rendition was translated by personnel delegated by the Secretariat of Sahabat Rakyat. This article provides a historical lesson learned about the destruction bore from within of the anti-colonial independence movement of the people of Malaya and Singapore plotted by the enemy, and constitutes revelatory reference material to the realistic issues that this coming forum is probing into.

Sahabat Rakyat is an ideological exchange platform that focuses on promoting democratic human rights movement in our country. All committee members of Sahabat Rakyat are volunteers. We adhere to the stance of being independent and autonomous, we adopt the principle of being self-reliant, thrifty and hard work, and strive to promote the development of the democratic human rights movement toward the right direction.
We welcome those who are generous hearted to sponsor this event and other work that we carry out. For those who are interested to sponsor, please contact:

(1)Choo Shinn Chei 017-7721511
(2)Cheng Lee Whee 012-7177187
(3)Ngo Jian Yee 013-7778320


此外,现居新加坡的庄明湖已将他在《人民之友》发表的《20世纪60年代新加坡左派工运问题探索》(正篇)一文的英文译稿传送到编辑部,因原文中所述人物的姓名或者是党团工会组织的全称或简称,在译文中尚未解决或有待查证,需要一些时日来完成——人民之友工委都是自愿挤出时间来进行工作的,因而无法很快完成。经过一番努力,我们终于在9月30日刊出,为我们的17周年纪念增添光彩!

值得在此一提的是,庄文所述的20世纪60年代新加坡工运遭遇问题(除了遭受来自外部的镇压,还要遭遇来自内部的破坏)的见解,或许能为一些读者(特别是不谙华文和不懂新马历史的读者)思考马来西亚民主改革运动在当前阶段面临马哈迪主义复辟的问题,提供一个历史殷鉴,或者是一个新的启示。


Malaysia Time (GMT+8)